On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Ian Barton wrote:
> I have been struggling to get the info from the git repo to display in
> Emacs, rather than the default info.
>
> In my .emacs I have: (add-to-list 'Info-default-directory-list
> "~/.emacs.d/src/org-mode/doc/")
>
> C-h v Info-directory-list shows
Changed "yasnippets" to "yasnippet" and added extra whitespace around functions
to be consistent with the rest of the section.
---
doc/org.texi |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/org.texi b/doc/org.texi
index 4d696ae..a30d5b6 100644
--- a/doc/org.texi
Hi Eric and Niels,
"Eric Schulte" wrote:
> niels giesen writes:
>> Please see the patch below, it adds property inheritance for all
>> MAIL_* properties, based on the value of
>> `org-use-property-inheritance'.
>
> Thanks for the patch, and for the motivating usage example. -- Eric
If I understa
Hello,
I want an octave babel code block to generate an org table as the
/result/ so that it can be used by another code block elsewhere in my
document. Typically, because of how I generate my data, I would like
babel to create the table from the /output/ of the octave code, not the
value. Howev
Sébastien Vauban writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Tassilo Horn writes:
>>> this patch should do the trick. I think the issue was a malformed Date:
>>> header that couldn't be converted to a timestamp.
>>
>> Actually, I am curious about this. What is the point of extracting the date
I would like to add anniversary entries to another Org file then other
diaries. Would it be possible? There is a suggested patch in the attachment.
Thank you a lot,
Jura
patch.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Rep
On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
There's recently been some advocacy of using buffer-local variables
for
Org-mode configuration. It seems like a good idea to me. However, I
think that it raises a problem: there are at least two situations in
which Org internally spawns a buffer
On Jan 2, 2011, at 5:23 PM, David Maus wrote:
At Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:21:56 +0100,
peter.fri...@agfa.com wrote:
'Goto Today' seems to go to the first day of the week instead of the
current day when the agenda is in Day view.
Is this still a problem? I don't seem to be able to reproduce thi
On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Noorul Islam K M writes:
Bernt Hansen writes:
Hi,
If you are viewing the agenda with a time span of a week (or
anything
larger than a day) and then use 'J' to jump to a new date the span
changes back to day.
For me, I have 'J' bound
Hi,
I ran into a bug with the ascii export. Exporting the attached org
file to ascii fails (see the attached backtrace). The failure seems to
be related to the 'H:10' option.
I had a look at the code and the following patch seemed to alleviate the issue:
-- lisp/org-a
On 14 Jan 2011, at 13:30, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2011, at 5:23 PM, David Maus wrote:
>
>> At Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:21:56 +0100,
>> peter.fri...@agfa.com wrote:
>>>
>>> 'Goto Today' seems to go to the first day of the week instead of the
>>> current day when the agenda is in Day vie
Hi Paul,
Paul Sexton writes:
> In agenda todo lists, currently it is possible to ignore scheduled
> items according to when they are scheduled, using the variable
> 'org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled'. This can take one of three
> values - all, future (ignore if scheduled after today), or past
>
Thanks for the patch. It has been applied.
Jeffrey Horn writes:
> Changed "yasnippets" to "yasnippet" and added extra whitespace around
> functions to be consistent with the rest of the section.
> ---
> doc/org.texi |4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --gi
Hi Seb,
Good idea, I've just placed this behind a new
`org-mime-use-property-inheritance' variable which will default to nil.
I was originally going to have this variable default to t, but the idea
of causing people to accidentally add unintended recipients to emails is
too scary.
Thanks for the
Juraj Kubelka writes:
Hi, Juraj,
> I would like to add anniversary entries to another Org file then other
> diaries. Would it be possible?
Isn't the following "code" in an org-file (in the agenda-list) enough?
** Birthdays & anniversaries
:PROPERTIES:
:CATEGORY: Ann
:END:
Hi Gionanni,
As I understand code in org-agenda-add-entry-to-org-agenda-diary-file
function, it search for "* Anniversaries" string in org-agenda-diary-file
file. It is the same file, where other events ("i d" (day), "i b" (block))
are inserted. But I would like to paste anniversaries to another o
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>>
>>> Bernt Hansen writes:
>>>
Hi,
If you are viewing the agenda with a time span of a week (or
anything
larger than a day) and then use 'J' to jump to a new date t
On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Noorul Islam K M writes:
Bernt Hansen writes:
Hi,
If you are viewing the agenda with a time span of a week (or
anything
larger than a day) and then use 'J' to ju
Hi,
I just noticed that S- and S- do not select anywhere in
the buffer in org-mode, even when org-support-shift-select is set to
'always. Can anyone confirm this behavior?
I am running this morning's org-mode git pull version 7.4
(release_7.4.174.g163cd.dirty) on today's Emacs nightly GNU
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>>
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Bernt Hansen writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you are viewing the agenda with a
Hello,
I use Org also at my job to write some short reports. These reports may
contains URLs to Doors objects. Doors is a paying S/W to manage a
requirement data base --- this is used in the industry for
writing complex specification documents where each clause has to be
tracked like a separate ob
[...]
>>
>> My understanding is that the bug resides in this very expression.
>
>Thanks for the investigation. As it turned out the problem was not
>with the regular expression but with the order in which different
>pieces of Org mode markup were processed by `org-export-as-html'.
>First the e
Hello,
I am restarting this very old thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2006-05/msg00121.html
see also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-12/msg01229.html
I realized that `M-x org-store-link' does now work with info nodes, and
that the info nodes links a
Hi,
Try these:
[[info:org:Link abbreviations]]
[[info:org:Adding%20hyperlink%20types][info:org:Adding hyperlink types]]
Yours,
Christian
On 1/14/11 10:27 PM, Vincent Belaïche wrote:
Hello,
I use Org also at my job to write some short reports. These reports may
contains URLs to Doors objects
I've written an addon that I call org-stow. The basic idea is that
all remember notes live in a notes section, and you can make another
location pretend that the note lives there. You build all or part of
a document that way. If you know how stow works, it's like stow for
outline items.
Yes, it
I can see that TODOs can be organized using tags, or categories, or
files, or simply subtrees (or several of those). Is there an obvious
choice?
All I'm really looking for is a basic organization, to let me "group"
tasks of different broad functional areas -- accounting, recruitment,
IT, and so o
Carl Bolduc writes:
> Where I work, we have a powerful search engine that indexes all kinds
> of files. It detects the converter to use based on the file extension.
> It does not understand the .org extension.
>
> I would like to know how I could periodically export my org files to
> txt, maybe t
On 01/14/2011 09:35 PM, Tommy Kelly wrote:
I can see that TODOs can be organized using tags, or categories, or
files, or simply subtrees (or several of those). Is there an obvious
choice?
My vote is "NO", org is really about finding what works best for you,
and the plethora of choices reflects
On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Tommy Kelly wrote:
I can see that TODOs can be organized using tags, or categories, or
files, or simply subtrees (or several of those). Is there an obvious
choice?
All I'm really looking for is a basic organization, to let me "group"
tasks of different broad functi
> I can see that TODOs can be organized using tags, or categories, or
> files, or simply subtrees (or several of those). Is there an obvious
> choice?
>From my own experience, Orgmode 'favors' tags more than categories i.e.,
there is more bells and whistles surrounding tags rather than
categorie
At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:12:07 +0100,
Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> Thank-you David again for carrying out this correction. By the way, I
> noticed in the source tree that has a test base, that there is some
> testing sub-directory. I was expecting that there would be a list of
>
> testNN.org
> testNN.t
31 matches
Mail list logo
