Hi Eric,
Did you read my proposals in detail?
Samuel
On 2010-08-08, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch implements in-buffer coloring and html export using
> the syntax proposed below.
>
> While I think this is an improvement over my previous patch, this idea
> still has some short
On Aug 9, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Hi Carsten, org-mode developers,
* Carsten Dominik [02. Aug. 2010]:
I am not sure I would like such a change because I think it
makes the manual harder and less fluid to read and considerably
longer.
It makes the manual longer as in bytes
On Aug 8, 2010, at 11:00 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Vinh Nguyen writes:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Eric Schulte
wrote:
In playing with the patched code I sent out, I noticed that it may
be
doing weird things to my headings (#+Title: etc...) in some Org-mode
files, so probably it could
Hi Nicolas,
On Aug 7, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
I'm still into lists,
First, my apologies that I have so far not found the time to test your
improved list implementation. I think this is a far-reaching change,
which is why it needs careful testing before we apply it.
On Aug 7, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Bastien wrote:
Bernt Hansen writes:
I'm not against this change since I've never used J in the agenda
before
(mostly because I wasn't aware of this key binding at all).
C-c C-x C-j is now bound to org-agenda-clock-goto in agenda buffers
and
to org-clock-go
On 08/07/2010 07:00 PM, scraw...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Ok, if I make "foo" a link:
>
> blah blah [[foo]] blah
>
> it will pop over to "foo" elsewhere in the buffer.
>
> (This is a tangent, but I see carets in the documentation, like
> "" , but they don't seem to be needed-- the link f
Am 09.08.2010, 08:28 Uhr, schrieb Carsten Dominik
:
Nope, I am against this syntax. If we introduce a more general syntax,
then it should be done in the way Samuel proposed. WHich means
we firs get a keyword indtroducing the piece, and then properties.
Like
$[style :color red the red t
Am 09.08.2010, 09:37 Uhr, schrieb Robert Klein :
Sorry dropped something on the keyboard and sent the message early :(
Am 09.08.2010, 08:28 Uhr, schrieb Carsten Dominik
:
Nope, I am against this syntax. If we introduce a more general syntax,
then it should be done in the way Samuel proposed.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:36:45AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Here is what I read at the bottom of every emacswiki.org page:
>
> This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public
> License. [..]
> So this is GPLv2. Any idea why this isn't GPLv3?
No clue. I must confess th
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Gregor Zattler wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten, org-mode developers,
>> * Carsten Dominik [02. Aug. 2010]:
>>> I am not sure I would like such a change because I think it
>>> makes the manual harder and less fluid to read and considerably
>>> longer.
On Aug 8, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
Richard Riley writes:
I upgraded to latest git version and modified my setup to use
org-capture.
Even using the default templates and keybindings in the docs I get
the
following backtrace when trying to create a new todo item based on
org-
Re-submitting my earlier patch. Please ignore the earlier one.
> Comments:
> Support for specifying the duration in absolute minutes could be
> useful in some cases. (In my case, I was trying to plug in the
> duration of a BBC production specified in minutes - for eg 92 min,
Hello,
Here is a complete minimal example...
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+TITLE: Refiling troubles with inlined Org
#+AUTHOR:Sebastien Vauban
#+DATE: 2010-08-09
#+DESCRIPTION:
#+KEYWORDS:
#+LANGUAGE: en_US
* First section
** The item I wann
I could not (re)find a reference I saw a while back about setting DONE TODO
items with a strikethrough.
Can anyone remember how to set this?
Thanks
'Mash
---
'to life is doxology
http://toshine.org
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply A
Hi Andreas, org-mode developers,
* Andreas Burtzlaff [09. Aug. 2010]:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>> I have put a version of the manual as modified by Andreas here:
>>
>>http://orgmode.org/org-manual-with-command-names.pdf
>>
>> Not all the command names are in there, but quite a few are.
>> I'
On Aug 9, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Hi Andreas, org-mode developers,
* Andreas Burtzlaff [09. Aug. 2010]:
Carsten Dominik writes:
I have put a version of the manual as modified by Andreas here:
http://orgmode.org/org-manual-with-command-names.pdf
Not all the command names
Hi Mash,
'Mash wrote:
> I could not (re)find a reference I saw a while back about setting DONE TODO
> items with a strikethrough.
>
> Can anyone remember how to set this?
Customize the face `org-done' to be something like this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(o
Hello,
> Carsten Dominik writes:
> First, my apologies that I have so far not found the time to test
> your improved list implementation.
No worries, I needed that time anyways, as some internals have
undergone big changes since then. I particularly think about the now
(hopefully) working ind
> 2. [...@start:2] I like
> 3. prime numbered
> 5. [...@start:5] lists
> It sure is heavy on syntax, but benefit is that every exporter will
> reflect that unusual numbering.
Thinking about it, we could even lighten [...@start:xx] syntax by making
it [...@num]. It would also make more sense since
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Some of the original arguments, that these names would stick
> more easily and that it would make it easy for a hacker to
> find the command name for rebinding, these do not fly, I think.
> I don't think anyone calls Org commands with M-x, and if a
> hacker needs to find
I ran into this, so I'll warn others. It might belong in the notes for
org-7.01.
If you have a newer version of emacs that has org already integrated,
you get some, but not all, of the org-7.01 features functioning if you
have org-7.01 set as the auto-load directory. I had been using org by
havi
Yeah, this is a big issue and I haven't seen it being mentioned on the
org manual. Emacs has org integrated, which is good for casual users,
and for org of course, but creates some headaches if you want to stay
on the bleeding edge of development. I also did what you have done, in
my case, on OSX,
Did you try C-c ' ?
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Gregor Zattler writes:
> Hi Andreas, org-mode developers,
> * Andreas Burtzlaff [09. Aug. 2010]:
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>> I have put a version of the manual as modified by Andreas here:
>>>
>>>http://orgmode.org/org-manual-with-command-names.pdf
>>>
>>> Not all the command names are i
Hi Seb,
If you edit the contents of your org source blocks using
org-edit-special (bound to C-c ') then it will protect org-mode syntax
and prevent these sort of issues.
Best -- Eric
Sébastien Vauban writes:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a complete minimal example...
>
> #+TITLE: Refiling troubles
Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
>I modified the scheme and the function. I think, that these 2 if-s
>just complicate the code for comprehension: we have 3 cases, for each
>of them we should return the appropriate value.
Yes, `cond' is more suitable here.
>All the tests work fine with the new version.
>When
Dan Davison writes:
> Gregor Zattler writes:
>
>> Hi Andreas, org-mode developers,
>> * Andreas Burtzlaff [09. Aug. 2010]:
>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
I have put a version of the manual as modified by Andreas here:
http://orgmode.org/org-manual-with-command-names.pdf
>>>
Bastien wrote:
>Hi Tycho,
>tycho garen writes:
>> This seems fine, the only possible concern that I have with this is
>> that GFDL licensed code snippets aren't compatible with the GPL. I'm
>> not sure how much actual code is in worg, and if this is an issue, but
>> it's worth considering.
>Mhh
These two things recently hit my inbox:
Timestamp calculations in Emacs with org-mode
http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/EmacsOrgTimestamps
(via emacswiki.org)
Manual de Org
http://gnu.manticore.es/manual-org-emacs
(via emacswiki.org)
Best,
-- David
pgpstcYHcOr0S.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Hi,
the installation instructions for Org tell you that you need
make the autoload file org-install.el by typing make.
If you do not do this, autoloading will be broken. If you do,
I do not see what would go wrong.
- Carsten
On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Yeah, th
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:50 PM, David Maus wrote:
These two things recently hit my inbox:
Timestamp calculations in Emacs with org-mode
http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/EmacsOrgTimestamps
(via emacswiki.org)
Manual de Org
http://gnu.manticore.es/manual-org-emacs
(via emacswiki.org)
I am now
Hi Eric and Samuel,
"Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> #+BEGIN_SRC org
>> ** Totals
>> *** Using a table formula
>> #+END_SRC
>
> If you edit the contents of your org source blocks using org-edit-special
> (bound to C-c ') then it will protect org-mode syntax and prevent these sort
> of issues.
Did not kno
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:50 PM, David Maus wrote:
>
> > These two things recently hit my inbox:
> >
> > Timestamp calculations in Emacs with org-mode
> > http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/EmacsOrgTimestamps
> > (via emacswiki.org)
> >
> > Manual de Org
> > http://gnu.ma
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:50 PM, David Maus wrote:
These two things recently hit my inbox:
Timestamp calculations in Emacs with org-mode
http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/EmacsOrgTimestamps
(via emacswiki.org)
Manual de
Hi Dan,
Dan Davison wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban
> writes:
>> Sebastian Rose wrote:
>>> Dan Davison writes:
Can you point me to an example that shows how to make source code in
latex look (almost) as nice as html?
>>>
>>> That is supposed to work with the `listings' package. I havent tri
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:50 PM, David Maus wrote:
>>>
These two things recently hit my inbox:
Timestamp calculations in Emacs with org-mode
http://www.hollenback.net/in
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Andreas Burtzlaff wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:50 PM, David Maus wrote:
These two things recently hit my inbox:
Timestamp calculations in Emacs with org-mode
htt
Hello,
I'm using org-mode to write R code and generate figures.
I have multiple files generated per code block, one png and one PDF.
This is so that I can display the graphic:
1) Inline in my org-mode buffer (png)
2) Upon export to HTML, viewable in the browser (png)
3) Included in a separate P
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > ,
...
> > | I am smc here at manticore dot es.
...
> > `
>
> No name here either, right?
>
No name, but there is an email address.
Nick
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the
Dan Davison writes:
> "David O'Toole" writes:
>
>> I've got a preliminary patch that adds optional "native" fontification
>> for source blocks. It uses the block's declared mode to fontify the
>> block text. So now blocks look the way they should, and this opens the
>> way to further enhancement
The http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.php#sec-3 says:
"Git can be used to make patches and send them via email - this is perfectly
fine for minor changes. These patches will be automatically registered at John
Wiegley's patchwork server"
Please, tell me, what commands should I run to creat
Hi Erik,
There is a planned feature for Org-babel which should subsume these use
cases, namely backend-conditional header arguments. These would allow
you to specify different header arguments (including file) depending on
the export target, be that html, latex, or none if you are just
interactiv
Sounds good, and perhaps another 'export' target could be tangling of the code.
On 08/09/2010 06:00 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Hi Erik,
There is a planned feature for Org-babel which should subsume these use
cases, namely backend-conditional header arguments. These would allow
you to specify dif
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:59:57AM +0400, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
> The http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.php#sec-3 says:
> "Git can be used to make patches and send them via email - this is
> perfectly fine for minor changes. These patches will be
> automatically registered at John Wiegley's pat
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:40:05 +1000, Bart Bunting wrote:
> Hi all,,
>
> A while back a notmuch link patch was posted to the list.
>
> I think it was written by David Bremner but don't appear to be able to
> find the exact mail now.
>
> Is there any update on the patch and or plans to include it
Juan writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:59:57AM +0400, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
>> The http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.php#sec-3 says:
>> "Git can be used to make patches and send them via email - this is
>> perfectly fine for minor changes. These patches will be
>> automatically registered
Dan Davison writes:
> I would like the command names in the manual.
>
> - Emacs-lisp has a lovely tradition of naming functions *very*
> descriptively and not being afraid to use long names in the interests
> of accuracy. It's a shame to lose all that by displaying only key
> sequences. It'
Hi,
> IIRC there was some back and forth about compatibility of this
> statement and the GPL, but cannot remember where I read this.
Thats exactly what I remembered, and I searched gmane for it.
This topic (emacswiki and license) came up when bzr was adopted
and the main document for transition
Hi,
>>
>> - this would be extensible, e.g.
>>
>> [background[yellow] highlighted text]
>>
>> could export to the following html
>>
>> highlighted text
>>
>> - this would avoid "{}"s
>>
>> - this would look more "org-like" than the pure latex solution
>>
>> the only issue with the above is that
If I enter or edit a link with org-insert-link, I only get
tab-completion for the URL prefix (e.g. fi puts "file"), but not for
the path name for "file:" links. So, if I type C-c C-l file:~/.ema
, I expect to get file:~/.emacs (the possibilities are .emacs and
.emacs.d/), but all I get is the mes
Sébastien Vauban
writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Davison wrote:
>> Sébastien Vauban
>>
>> writes:
>>> Sebastian Rose wrote:
Dan Davison writes:
> Can you point me to an example that shows how to make source code in
> latex look (almost) as nice as html?
That is supposed to
51 matches
Mail list logo
