Sebastian Rose writes:
> Richard Riley writes:
>> It's been a while since I've looked at my org set up. One thing that
>> always struck me as a bit hacky was my use of
>>
>> :preamble "
>>
>> and the corresponding postamble to enclose the exported web pages into a
>> "container" div. Is there a
Richard Riley writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> Richard Riley writes:
>>> It's been a while since I've looked at my org set up. One thing that
>>> always struck me as a bit hacky was my use of
>>>
>>> :preamble "
>>>
>>> and the corresponding postamble to enclose the exported web pages into
Hi Sebastian,
On Mar 2, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
* Suggestions for names
`wrap' is, what they use in typolight and some other CMSs. But
`content' sounds good to me too.
...
2
Konfiguration
I have been using the latest org versions on a mac and on ubuntu,
updating according to instructions originally provided by Scott Randby
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/7783/match=randby+hagmann+install).
It has always worked nicely, up to version 6.22trans. Since then it
still w
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>>
>> * Suggestions for names
>>
>> `wrap' is, what they use in typolight and some other CMSs. But
>> `content' sounds good to me too.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
OK, so I will wait with making changes until you have
done some experimentation, maybe put that up somewhere,
so that others can have a look?
- Carsten
On Mar 2, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Sebastian,
On Mar 2, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote
[Thank you to Bernt for the *clear* explanation of using branches!]
I seem to be moving out of the woods with this, and for the most
part, the experiment has been going smoothly. However, I've run
afoul of permissions, a bugaboo that was mentioned in an earlier
post on t
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Richard Riley writes:
>> Sebastian Rose writes:
>>
>>> Richard Riley writes:
It's been a while since I've looked at my org set up. One thing that
always struck me as a bit hacky was my use of
:preamble "
and the corresponding postamble to
Changing the permissions and using a group shouldn't be necessary.
If you're using Linux to mount the usb stick the 'user' option makes all
of the files on the drive owned by the person that mounts it.
,[ /etc/fstab ]
| /dev/sdb1 /usb vfat defaults,user,noauto,shortname=mixed 0 0
`
Then
OK - I failed badly :-(
I think we can skip the extra element around the TOC.
Here's why:
As it looks now, the problem with the fixed TOC does not go away. My
old trick seems to work only for HTML doctype and/or tables... Should
have tested that one before...
So until now it's not g
Hi Taru
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
> Selecting only some entries to display would be possible,
> but is it really necessary? In my use cases I just tend
> to have a per-article bib-file that contains the entries
> I wish to use. Making a rich enough API to sort, reforma
Richard Riley writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> Richard Riley writes:
>>> Sebastian Rose writes:
>>>
Richard Riley writes:
> It's been a while since I've looked at my org set up. One thing that
> always struck me as a bit hacky was my use of
>
> :preamble "
>
>
On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
OK - I failed badly :-(
I think we can skip the extra element around the TOC.
Here's why:
As it looks now, the problem with the fixed TOC does not go away. My
old trick seems to work only for HTML doctype and/or tables...
Should
have
Hi. I have this scenario: I track several projects in a single file, each in
its own level-1 section, but each week I'm working only on one project.
In my agenda (C-a a) I'm currently seeing scheduled tasks from all projects,
and I would like to exclude all projects but one.
I recently add
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
>>
>> OK - I failed badly :-(
>>
>> I think we can skip the extra element around the TOC.
>>
>> Here's why:
>>
>> As it looks now, the problem with the fixed TOC does not go away. My
>> old trick seems to work only f
I've been wondering about something similar. Suppose you have a bunch
of important tasks and a bunch of fluff tasks. It might be useful to
be able to have the "agenda" item in org-agenda-custom-commands accept
a tags search so that you can use :fluff: on the fluff tasks and
assign a key for every
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Clemente writes:
> Hi. I have this scenario: I track several projects in a single file,
> each in its own level-1 section, but each week I'm working only on
> one project. In my agenda (C-a a) I'm currently seeing scheduled
> tasks from all projects, and I would like
Assign a FLUFF tag to your tasks then run the agenda normally and remove
the fluff with
/ - TAB FLUFF RET
or if you do that often set up org-tags-alist with F for FLUFF and just
/ - F
-Bernt
Samuel Wales writes:
> I've been wondering about something similar. Suppose you have a bunch
> of i
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
>>
>> OK - I failed badly :-(
>>
>> I think we can skip the extra element around the TOC.
>>
>> Here's why:
>>
>> As it looks now, the problem with the fixed TOC does not go away. My
>> old trick seems to work only
Richard Riley writes:
> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated
> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is
> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately.
The IDs in the section headings are not meant for CSS styling. That's
wh
Richard Riley writes:
> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated
> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is
> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately.
Forgot to say: the ID's are, what the links in the TOC jump to. Also,
t
Sebastian Rose writes:
>> So one that wraps everything in body. OK, let's call it "content".
>>
>> And then one that does contains the sections and footnotes, but
>> not the title, preamble, and postamble? Am I understanding this
>> correctly?
>
>
> Just the outer one then. As long as noone uses
Using the latest from git: when I try to archive a subtree with C-c
$, I get
org-archive-subtree: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
Archive is going to the default location, in my case Tasks.org_archive
in the
same directory. This also failed with a newly created file.
Thanks,
Ed Hirgelt wrote:
> Using the latest from git: when I try to archive a subtree with C-c
> $, I get
>
> org-archive-subtree: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
>
> Archive is going to the default location, in my case Tasks.org_archive
> in the
> same directory. This also failed w
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Hello Dominik,
Sorry, I meant "Prof. Dominik". The email address misled me. :-)
Baoqiu
> use it two weeks ago. I've been using (X)Emacs since 1995, and had
> tried to use Muse about 2-3 years ago for note-taking and simple
> publishing (i.e. generating LaTeX or DocBook
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Richard Riley writes:
>> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated
>> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is
>> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately.
>
> The IDs in the section headings are not
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Clemente writes:
> Hi. I have this scenario: I track several projects in a single file, each
> in its own level-1 section, but each week I'm working only on one project.
> In my agenda (C-a a) I'm currently seeing scheduled tasks from all
> projects, and I would like to e
Richard Riley writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> Richard Riley writes:
>>> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated
>>> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is
>>> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately.
>>
>> The IDs
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Richard Riley writes:
>> Sebastian Rose writes:
>>
>>> Richard Riley writes:
I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated
being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is
entered. This make existing CSS redun
Nobody else has commented on this, so perhaps I am doing something wrong.
My recollection is that [setting the todo state of a task with a
repeating scheduled task to done] did not used to insert a closed
timestamp, but now it seems to -- or at least it fails to remove the
timestamp. Is this inte
Ed Hirgelt wrote:
> Using the latest from git: when I try to archive a subtree with C-c
> $, I get
>
> org-archive-subtree: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
>
> Archive is going to the default location, in my case Tasks.org_archive
> in the
> same directory. This also failed with
Hi Carsten,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> 1) priority faces are settable in the agenda. perhaps
>> they could be so in the outline also.
>
> This seems more confusing than useful to me. In the agenda,
> all the tasks are together, so it does make some sense to
> cha
Fixed, thanks.
Nick, also thanks for so quickly confirming this bug and for
the correct analysis.
- Carsten
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Ed Hirgelt wrote:
Using the latest from git: when I try to archive a subtree with C-c
$, I get
org-archive-subtree: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker
Begin forwarded message:
From: Carsten Dominik
Date: March 3, 2009 6:54:14 AM GMT+01:00
To: Samuel Wales
Cc: Carsten Dominik
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] ascii export of url part of links possible?
I think we need more testers here, could someone please come aboard?
I cannot reproduce the bug Sa
On 02.03 10:40, William Henney wrote:
> > Selecting only some entries to display would be possible,
> > but is it really necessary? In my use cases I just tend
> > to have a per-article bib-file that contains the entries
> > I wish to use. Making a rich enough API to sort, reformat
> > and select a
35 matches
Mail list logo
