Re: [Orgmode] Release 5.23a

Richard G Riley wrote: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Xin Shi wrote: Hi, Thanks for the release! There is a bug which I got from an Email several weeks ago said it has been fixed, but I still found it in the 5.23a. When export the org file

Re: [Orgmode] Release 5.23a

Xin Shi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard G Riley wrote: >> Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Xin Shi wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Thanks for the release! There is a bug which I got from an Email several weeks ago said it

Re: [Orgmode] Release 5.23a

Hi Richard, I'm very glad to hear that! I like to use nXhtml to cope with CSS file, it is great :) Xin Richard G Riley wrote: Xin Shi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard G Riley wrote: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Xin Shi wr

Re: [Orgmode] Release 5.23a - [BUG ?] closing-notes

Hi, eveeryone, I have 2 problem with the repeating time and notes. org version : Org-mode version 5.23a emacs version: GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2007-06-02 on RELEASE OS: WinXP minimum org file: #+SEQ_TODO: TODO DONE #+STARTUP: lognote

Re: [Orgmode] Release 5.23a - [BUG ?] closing-notes

Hi Giovanni, Giovanni Ridolfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #+SEQ_TODO: TODO DONE > #+STARTUP: lognotedone > > * TODO write data proof > DEADLINE: <2008-03-10 lun +1d> Use lognoterepeat for logging such timestamps. > Comment: With v.5.21 I had: > - CLOSING NOTE [2008-03-10 lun 16:43

[Orgmode] How to set a date relative to the original date?

Hi, I read the tutorial on http://members.optusnet.com.au/~charles57/GTD/org_dates/ about how to use dates. The tutorial says I can use "++3d" to indicate "3 days after the default date". My understanding is the default date is the original date in the schedule. So, if I do a "C-c C-s" and in

Re: [Orgmode] How to set a date relative to the original date?

Hi Wanrong, Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * MAYBE A test > SCHEDULED: <2008-02-13 Wed> > > But I found "++3d" produces the same result as "+3d", which is 3 days > after today. AFAIK, the difference between +2d and ++2d is only relevant when *editing* the timestamp at point -- not wh

Re: [Orgmode] How to set a date relative to the original date?

Bastien Guerry wrote: Hi Wanrong, Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: * MAYBE A test SCHEDULED: <2008-02-13 Wed> But I found "++3d" produces the same result as "+3d", which is 3 days after today. AFAIK, the difference between +2d and ++2d is only relevant when *editing* the tim