Charles Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or you could just do "M-return M-right" - is that really too slow for
>> you?
>
> Thank you! I hadn't thought of that. Entering M-right is easy
> because I am already holding the Meta key with my thumb so it is just
> a matter of continuing to hold the
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G'day. I am a fan of `newline-and-indent', and turn it on for most of
> the modes I routinely use, since it is almost always what I want done.
>
> org-mode rebinds the "return" key to `org-return', which acts
> intelligently in the face of
Hi Christopher,
Christopher League <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Dec 8, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> The idea sounds great! though I copied your code into a buffer, did
>> M-x eval-buffer, typed C-c a m and couldn't get any of the "electric"
>> keys to behave any differently to norm
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to have a link whose description contains the
> characters '[' and/or ']' ? For example, one might want a link to a
> mail on this list to contain the contents of the Subject: header,
> which of course includes "[Orgmode]".
>
> If not, woul
Hi Tim,
thanks for the details. I think I got confused because I couldn't
understand what you mean by a link being "processed" when compiling
the agenda. Now I understand that it means some kind of inclusion.
So the issue seems twofold:
1. the first issue is about *including* external Org fil
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> G'day. I am a fan of `newline-and-indent', and turn it on for most
>> of the modes I routinely use, since it is almost always what I want
>> done.
[...]
> I think having a new option is not the best solution.
Hi,
sorry that I have been so quiet recently - my powerbook died and I am
struggling to get my computing environment back to normal. I will look at
all those messages in due time
- Carsten
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to se
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1) It's convenient to be able to double-check the content of the
>>*Remember* buffer before remembering it with `C-c C-c'.
>
> It can be yes, but I think it's really a matter of personal taste
> applied on a per-template basis. Personally I would rat
G'day.
I have found org mode incredibly good and useful so far, to my surprise,
as I usually find outlining tools in Emacs very frustrating. This is a
really pleasant change -- and great, since it fills a gap in my task and
project management requirements.
I do have one gripe, though, that I hop
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm certainly not suggesting making it the default - only to make it
> > possible to enable this behaviour for selected remember templates.
> > But since I get SO many emails every day, I really n
Bastien schrieb:
> Rainer Stengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> thanks for asking, but I cannot not send the complete trace with
>> Thunderbird editor because of the special characters. Pasting the
>> text stops at some place in the middle.
>
> Ok, no problem. Thanks for the complete backtr
My TODO.org files have per-file custom keyword (#+SEQ_TODO) and tag
(#+TAGS) settings. I noticed a few areas for improving editing
remember notes w.r.t. these:
a) If editing a note in a *Remember* buffer which came from a
template containing a custom keyword e.g. "NEXT", the org
major
It would be very handy if prompts in org remember templates could
optionally have default values, e.g. %^{prompt text|default value}.
P.S. Hopefully it shouldn't be long now before my company's lawyers
give me clearance to submit a copyright assignment form to the FSF, so
I can start giving more r
On 11/12/2007, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> thanks for the details. I think I got confused because I couldn't
> understand what you mean by a link being "processed" when compiling
> the agenda. Now I understand that it means some kind of inclusion.
>
> So the issue seems twofo
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are two specific problems:
>
> I put multiple blank lines before a top level heading to get visible
> whitespace, in this sort of structure:
>
> * Some Stuff
> ** A first item.
> ** Blah Blah
>
>
> * Other Stuff -- with a line even whe
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I put multiple blank lines before a top level heading to get visible
>> whitespace, in this sort of structure:
>>
>> * Some Stuff
>> ** A first item.
>> ** Blah Blah
[...]
>> If I was then to move '** Blah Blah' under the 'Other Stuff' heading
>> using the
On Dec 11, 2007 3:58 PM, Phil Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On a side note; I use C-p, C-n, C-b and C-f for my basic navigation
> meaning the cursor keys are free for me so in org I bind them to:
>
> ,
> | (define-key org-mode-map [left] 'org-metaleft)
> | (define-key org-mode-map [
Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my org file I have a mix of "actionable" items (TODO items) and
> informative items (notes, references and etc). Normally I only archive
> TODO items when they are done, and don't archive informative items
> (since most of them have some long-term value
Phil Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The problem is that there is no way to tell that the two blank lines
>> after "** Blah blah" are part of "** Blah blah" or part of "* Some
>> stuff".
>
> [...]
>
>> What do you think?
>
> I suffer this problem too. I can't think of a situation where blan
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think this would be nice. But I guess you see my point about
>> cancelling : with a %^{prompt} it's possible to C-g, but not when there
>> is no %^{prompt} -- which might be a bit dangerous..
>
> It doesn't seem particularly dangerous to me: you still
"Tim O'Callaghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. the first issue is about *including* external Org files (or other
>>external resources, although I'm not sure to understand what does
>>that mean);
>
> Yes and no. by *including* external resources i was thinking
> remote org files, and t
Tim O'Callaghan gmail.com> writes:
> Yes. My idea was essentially, when i ask org to create an agenda
> buffer, it knows to auto-pull and process each all of these
> active links, so as to be able to display them in my Agenda.
I still don't quite understand why you do not use existing infrastruc
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be very handy if prompts in org remember templates could
> optionally have default values, e.g. %^{prompt text|default value}.
Good idea. What about also specifying a history:
%^{prompt text|default value|history value1|history value2}
--
B
Christian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tim O'Callaghan gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Yes. My idea was essentially, when i ask org to create an agenda
>> buffer, it knows to auto-pull and process each all of these
>> active links, so as to be able to display them in my Agenda.
>
> I still don't qu
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:28:15PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It would be very handy if prompts in org remember templates could
> > optionally have default values, e.g. %^{prompt text|default value}.
>
> Good idea. What about also specifying a history:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:51:01PM +0200, Daniel M German wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> Some of you might be interested...
>
> I was able to cross-compile emacs-nox for the N800 (emacs22.1) and run
> org mode on it. YOu can check the screenshots here:
>
> http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/t
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:47:14PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Did you mean x11vnc? This isn't available in any of the OS2007
^^
> repositories yet :-/
I meant OS2008 ...
___
Emacs-orgmode
Bastien wrote:
Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In my org file I have a mix of "actionable" items (TODO items) and
informative items (notes, references and etc). Normally I only archive
TODO items when they are done, and don't archive informative items
(since most of them have some lo
28 matches
Mail list logo
