On Oct 10, 2007, at 12:15, Matiyam wrote:
Hi!
In my setup i have 5 org-remember-templates.
Since my memory is not very good :), i have modified
org-remember-templates
to include another element in the list that tells me the name of it.
And then org-remember-apply-template to, when promptin
On 2007-10-09 22:37 +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> However, in order to insert the LOCATION property, I need to first run
>> org-insert-property-drawer and then `C-c C-c s' ...
>>
>> Is there a better way of setting LOCATION?
>
> Well, no.
>
> But property drawers are
On Oct 10, 2007, at 10:37, John Wiegley wrote:
John Wiegley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This code snippet will modify your agenda buffer upon creation so
that the
string [#A] is bolded, and [#C] is italicized. It keeps whatever
color it
had, it's just now strong or weak based on priority.
(Sorry, I'm writing this in my very-early Eurostar, it may not be
accurate at the time it will be sent.)
"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm losing track of who proposed what. I was up late last night. I'm
> liking the TRIGGER/BLOCKER idea that Bastien has been talking about,
R
"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's hard to 'address' a todo item.
Not that hard: [[*Test%20headline]]
> Link's might be the best thing we have for that.
Exactly! And what if the text of the link could also store the todo
state value of its target (when both relevant and acc
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:44:11PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> "Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It's hard to 'address' a todo item.
>
> Not that hard: [[*Test%20headline]]
How does that work to address this case?
* Hardware
** TODO Install
* Software
** TODO Install :ADDRESSTHI
Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does that work to address this case?
>
> * Hardware
> ** TODO Install
> * Software
> ** TODO Install :ADDRESSTHISONE:
> * Patches
> ** TODO Install
>
> Thats why I thought a GUID property would be required.
I a sense, that shows that having a proper
> I a sense, that shows that having a proper GUID system will only be
> useful in case there are many tasks with the same name, which should
> already be discouraged since headlines may show up in the agenda buffer
> with no context at all.
I rarely have issues with conflicts in agenda. I use disc
On 10/11/07, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO, a better rationale behind GUID is that headlines can change and
> thus not be reached anymore by a search string. Having a GUID would
> fix this. But I'm definitely not a GUID-fan, sorry :)
In a sense that's why I said it was hard to address
Hi everyone,
I have read this discussion with great interest, and I would like to
add a few thoughts.
First, let me say that I was surprised that quite a few people are so
keen to see this kind of features. I myself would worry
a lot about spending more time to set up and maintain these connect
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have read this discussion with great interest, and I would like to
> add a few thoughts.
I guess some of us were waiting for that -- thanks for sorting this
out :)
> First, let me say that I was surprised that quite a few people are so
> keen to se
> "Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> First, let me say that I was surprised that quite a few
Carsten> people are so keen to see this kind of features. I myself
Carsten> would worry a lot about spending more time to set up and
Carsten> maintain th
Hey,
I'm new here but I have to say that I totally agree with Pete.
Why not just work on integration with popular project management
tools? e.g export to Jira, Trac, ...
(btw, syncing todos with Trac tickets would really come handy :)
Sebastjan
On 10/11/07, pete phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 04:53:42PM +0100, pete phillips wrote:
> org-mode is a superb PIM and list manager (in my view, probably about
> the best there is). Just because we have one incredible hammer, let's
> not start seeing everything else as a nail!
>
> Just a personal viewpoint of course. :-)
> "Russell" == Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russell> however you must realize that a tool meant to maintain
Russell> personal lists of items may eventually grow to encompass
Russell> larger projects.
:-)
I do realise this. But the question that needs to be answered
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:10:50PM +0100, pete phillips wrote:
> I do realise this. But the question that needs to be answered
> is whether this is necessarily the best path ?
It isn't necessarily. I'm just pointing out it's likely to grow as
more folks use it for larger lists. After all, most PM
Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the key here is that Org needs some PM-like functionality, but
> I certainly wouldn't advocate trying to make Org a full PM. Org is
> great for lists, notes, TODO's, etc. Ever try to take freeform notes
> in MS Project? ;]
>
> I'm interested to s
> "Russell" == Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russell> It isn't necessarily. I'm just pointing out it's likely to
Russell> grow as more folks use it for larger lists. After all, most
Russell> PM software just maintains a specialized kind of list.
Russell> Yes I've l
Russell Adams schrieb:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:10:50PM +0100, pete phillips wrote:
>> I do realise this. But the question that needs to be answered
>> is whether this is necessarily the best path ?
>
> It isn't necessarily. I'm just pointing out it's likely to grow as
> more folks use it for
On 2007-10-11 22:12 +0100, Rainer Stengele wrote:
> I also do not expect to grow Org into anything near a "full" PM.
> But I do would be more than glad to get some basic (trigger or blocker)
> functionality to model dependencies between todos.
I'd rather org stays as a PIM not PM; there are tons o
Categories are fairly handy for keeping the agenda well organised, but
what are the functionalities for moving tasks between different
categories e.g a task might move from "PROJ1" to "PROJ2" or some
such? Must it be done manually using cut and paste in the org file?
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 14:32, Richard G Riley wrote:
>
>>
>> Should something +3d work when rescheduling a task? It would be nice if
>> it did and be a little more consistent IMO.
>
> Yes, it would be more consistent so I will do this.
>
> However, a diffe
The spate of design memos about GUIDs and scheduling leads me to ask
this :
is there any concept of "depends on" at all at the moment in org? I
don't see it if there is. e.g its quite possible to have a level one
task complete but a level 2 one incomplete.
** DONE PHP/HTTP authentication
Hi,
I am generally against introducing very specialized features to
org-mode, for the same reasons as described by others in this thread.
The power of org-mode lies in simplicify of the model it offers:
information is a collection of lists that can be queried in various
ways.
This model is simple
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is there any concept of "depends on" at all at the moment in org?
Not strictly, but properties are inherited:
Doing (org-entry-get (point) "CATEGORY" t) on a headline will fetch the
category of the parent if this category is not defined for the head
Well, I think I'm going to try something else to get the task
dependencies I'm after. I'm using a BLOCKED tag now. I'm thinking
I'll go with a BLOCKED property followed by the list of blockers.
I'll probably use links there, but I'll have to find a way to make
that less fragile with the dynamic p
You could set a :CATEGORY: property for entry.
Edd
On 10/11/07, Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Categories are fairly handy for keeping the agenda well organised, but
> what are the functionalities for moving tasks between different
> categories e.g a task might move from "PROJ1" t
Org-mode 5.12 is up on http://orgmode.org
Enjoy!
- Carsten
Changes in Version 5.12
---
* Overview
- Remember templates can now have a name.
- `C-c C-k' will abort taking a note (remember of log)
- `C-c C-x C-w' and `C-c C-x M-w' now accept a prefix arg.
- Lines in
Hello,
I hope the subject line is clear, but I bet not.
I have a TODO item with both a schedule and a deadline and this
results in the item appearing twice after the deadline passes in my
Org weekly Agenda.
Is there a way that I can automatically change this behaviour? What I
do now is manually
29 matches
Mail list logo
