On Jun 19, 2007, at 19:45, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
Carsten,
Have spreadsheet like columns for lists been discussed before, and if
so, what was the verdict?
I have seen them mentioned before but never understood
what was meant, so nothing from my side happened. Thanks
for sending the illustrat
Hi all,
Do any of you use org-mode for literate programming? I think that
would be a very natural use of org-mode.
Support in other compilers may be minimal, but one can write a
Literate Haskell program in org-mode without any changes I
think. E.g. (a meaningless program from Haskell wikibook)
On Jun 19, 2007, at 18:25, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
#+STARTUP: hidestars
#+STARTUP: overview
#+STARTUP: odd
* links
** [[http://staff.science.uva.nl/~dominik/Tools/org/][org-mode]]
This is a part of an org-file I have. There are severall problems with
this under Windows. I use version 22.0.50.1
On Jun 21, 2007, at 16:06, J. David Boyd wrote:
When I archive an item, into an "_archive" file, the DONE date is set
to the
current date, rather than the date the item was completed on.
Is there a variable, (or could there be) to control this?
When I look into an archive file, I would lik
Hi Carsten
On 6/22/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 19, 2007, at 17:16, William Henney wrote:
> ... now that there is a syntactic difference between the bullet point
> types, how about having a function that cycles between them (just +
> and - by default). This could perhap
On Jun 19, 2007, at 17:16, William Henney wrote:
Just one more small request
On 6/19/07, William Henney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- Promotion and demotion of items gets the indentation right.
>
>- Indenting lines with TAB is
Emre Sahin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [... Haskell literals ...]
>
> In Literate Haskell, program lines start with a >. If it's not used,
> than the line is considered as a comment line, hence making org-mode
> useful in folding, maintainin TODOs etc. (This message is already a
> Literate Hask
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 16:06, J. David Boyd wrote:
>
>>
>> When I archive an item, into an "_archive" file, the DONE date is
>> set to the
>> current date, rather than the date the item was completed on.
>>
>> Is there a variable, (or could there be) to c
On 6/22/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I find a bit strange though is that it is using a hierarchy,
and every level of the hierarchy has the same columns. Columns
seem to make more sense for items with equal level, at least to me.
I think it's harder to design an interfac
Two issues with agenda:
- Tags are not right aligned.
Some appear a tab away from the end of the heading and others appear
only a space after it. Can we right align them and color them like in
org files?
- Links that are relative in a file may not work correctly in agenda.
Do most of you use a
On 6/22/07, Scott Jaderholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two issues with agenda:
- Tags are not right aligned.
Some appear a tab away from the end of the heading and others appear
only a space after it.
I should clarify:
Day-agenda:
Friday22 June 2007
work:In -2 d.: TODO Get ano
On 6/22/07, Scott Jaderholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it's harder to design an interface where different levels have
different columns.
Sometimes the columns will make sense on different levels so they opt
to leave them there. Also, as we see in the screenshot, they can be
used for summ
12 matches
Mail list logo