Hello, Carsten,
In org.el, line 3441, where the PRIORITIES line is parsed, the order
of parameters to org-split-string is wrong.
--
With best regards,
Dmitri Minaev
Russian history blog: http://minaev.blogspot.com
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emac
This looks great.
Are you planning to put this up on a website so that I can link
to your site? Or is it time to start that "contrib" directory
in the org-mode distribution... ?
- Carsten
On Jun 3, 2007, at 22:44, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
And, as promised, here's the updated version of the
On Jun 2, 2007, at 1:15, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
Carsten,
I think there's a typo causing this:
Yes. Fixed, thanks.
Also, is it hard to allow footnotes in tables?
No, not at all, I just did detecting footnote references in
the wrong place. Fixed as well.
Thanks.
- Carsten
___
As Eddward says, you seem to be able to circumvent this by not
allowing indent.el to use TAB characters for indentation:
(setq indent-tabs-mode nil)
It seems to me that this problem is a bug in the Emacs indentation
code, not in Org-mode.
- Carsten
On Jun 1, 2007, at 18:09, William Henney wrot
On Jun 1, 2007, at 23:34, Jason Dunsmore wrote:
> I think there is still a related bug in 4.76. If you put the
> following in an empty buffer:
>
> * level 1
> ** TODO level 2.0
> ** level 2.1
> ** level 2.3
>
> Press C-c C-v, go to the level 2.1 header, and press Tab, it isn't
> unfolded and t
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-04) wrote:-
> As Eddward says, you seem to be able to circumvent this by not
> allowing indent.el to use TAB characters for indentation:
>
> (setq indent-tabs-mode nil)
>
> It seems to me that this problem is a bug in the Emacs indentation
> code, not in Org-mode
It turns out that this was after all an org-mode bug.
Fixed for 4.77, thanks.
- Carsten
On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:08, Carsten Dominik wrote:
As Eddward says, you seem to be able to circumvent this by not
allowing indent.el to use TAB characters for indentation:
(setq indent-tabs-mode nil)
It se
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This looks great.
Thanks!
> Are you planning to put this up on a website so that I can link
> to your site? Or is it time to start that "contrib" directory
> in the org-mode distribution... ?
I am going to put it up on my website; I just wanted a
- Jason F. McBrayer (2007-06-04) wrote:-
>> Are you planning to put this up on a website so that I can link to
>> your site? Or is it time to start that "contrib" directory in the
>> org-mode distribution... ?
>
> I am going to put it up on my website; I just wanted a little feedback
> f
On 6/4/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It turns out that this was after all an org-mode bug.
Fixed for 4.77, thanks.
Thanks Carsten. Is this fix just for the indent-relative bug, or does
it fix the second (fill-paragraph) bug as well? I think that the
second bug might not have a
Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can that python script be converted to elisp?
It would be pretty simple to write something similar in elisp -- all
the script does is parse the output of org-batch-agenda-csv and
interpolate selected bits of it into a LaTeX skeleton. Of course, if
you were doing
Hi Carsten
Every time I use org's tables I am amazed at how powerful and easy
they are. There are just a couple of annoyances that I repeatedly come
across, and which I thought I'd better report.
* minor niggles concerning tables
** org-table-toggle-coordinate-overlays
This is great, but it is
A bug in xemacs/noutline.el was brought to the surface by a couple of
recent org-mode changes. Here are some test cases:
---snip-
* Heading 1
note
* Heading 2
** subheading
---snip-
If org-cycle-separator-lines is 2 then doing org-cycle on Heading 1
fa
Hi Aaron,
thank you very much, I have applied the patch.
- Carsten
On Jun 4, 2007, at 19:34, Aaron Kaplan wrote:
A bug in xemacs/noutline.el was brought to the surface by a couple of
recent org-mode changes. Here are some test cases:
---snip-
* Heading 1
note
* Hea
On Jun 4, 2007, at 15:39, William Henney wrote:
On 6/4/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It turns out that this was after all an org-mode bug.
Fixed for 4.77, thanks.
Thanks Carsten. Is this fix just for the indent-relative bug, or does
it fix the second (fill-paragraph) bug as
On Jun 4, 2007, at 18:05, William Henney wrote:
Hi Carsten
Every time I use org's tables I am amazed at how powerful and easy
they are. There are just a couple of annoyances that I repeatedly come
across, and which I thought I'd better report.
* minor niggles concerning tables
** org-table-to
On 6/4/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In fact, org-table-eval-formula understands both kinds of references.
Yes, of course, silly me!
Yes, I agree, this is hard and a bit unfortunate. If I could
start from scratch, I would make but the same, but for backward
compatibility I
On 6/4/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 4, 2007, at 15:39, William Henney wrote:
> Thanks Carsten. Is this fix just for the indent-relative bug, or does
> it fix the second (fill-paragraph) bug as well?
The fix will only fix the second bug (with fill-paragraph). The first
18 matches
Mail list logo
