Hello,
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait le 11/26/06 que :
> Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>> I guess my emacs-version or my gnus-version is responsible :
>>
>> Gnus v5.11
>> Emacs 22.0.51.1 (Emacs-multi-tty).
>
> Same problem with emacs-snapshot (Emacs 22.0.91.1)...
>
Lets just get this streight: You are all talking about an error
"org-store-link: Invalid function:gnus-summary-article-header"
In my version of gnus, this marco is defined in the file gnus-sum.el.
The only place this macro is used in org.el is in org-store-link,
and it looks like this:
Items that are DONE still show up on the day when they were scheduled.
But they are not being carried over to the next day as being overdue.
Does that need to be an option?
- Carsten
On Nov 26, 2006, at 23:42, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Apologies in advance, because I am sure this info is ava
Could someone make a backtrace of this error, with loading uncompiled
versions of gnus-sum.el and org.el? The org-mode manual describes how
to do this, basically
emacs -l /path/to/org.el -l /path/to/gnus-sum.el
Use the menu "Options" to turn on debug-on-error.
Then hit the bug and post the
On 11/27/06, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Items that are DONE still show up on the day when they were scheduled.
But they are not being carried over to the next day as being overdue.
Yes, they are not carried to the next day, but they are shown (with a
different color) in the age
Hello Carsten,
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait le 11/27/06 que :
> Could someone make a backtrace of this error, with loading uncompiled versions
> of gnus-sum.el and org.el? The org-mode manual describes how to do this,
> basically
>
>
> emacs -l /path/to/org.el -l /path/to/gnus-sum.
On Nov 27, 2006, at 12:55, Maurice Boucher wrote:
Hello Carsten,
I hope I can clearly explain my conclusions :
If I put org.el in my local emacs site, all is fine.
If I compile org.el with my emacs and put org.elc in my emacs site, all
is fine too.
If I do "make install" in folder org-4.56 (
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Items that are DONE still show up on the day when they were
> scheduled. But they are not being carried over to the next day as
> being overdue.
> Does that need to be an option?
That would be useful indeed.
--
Bastien
_
Re,
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait le 11/27/06 que :
>
> You should have edited the Makefile to make sure that the files are installed
> into the correct location. Specifically, lispdir should point to the
> same file where you do install the files when you do it by hand. Is that so
On Nov 27, 2006, at 15:20, Maurice Boucher wrote:
My two compiled files (by make install and by my emacs) are different.
my emacs (function emacs-lisp-byte-compile)
-rw-r--r-- 1 momo momo572679 2006-11-27 12:58 org.elc
make install or
in console : emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile or
On 11/27/06, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 27, 2006, at 14:30, Bastien wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Items that are DONE still show up on the day when they were
>> scheduled. But they are not being carried over to the next day as
>> being overdue
On Nov 27, 2006, at 14:30, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Items that are DONE still show up on the day when they were
scheduled. But they are not being carried over to the next day as
being overdue.
Does that need to be an option?
That would be useful indeed
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Could someone make a backtrace of this error, with loading uncompiled
> versions of gnus-sum.el and org.el? The org-mode manual describes how
> to do this, basically
>
> emacs -l /path/to/org.el -l /path/to/gnus-sum.el
Ok. The problem for me were
On Nov 27, 2006, at 21:24, Bernard Adrian wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Could someone make a backtrace of this error, with loading uncompiled
versions of gnus-sum.el and org.el? The org-mode manual describes how
to do this, basically
emacs -l /path/to/org.el -l /path/
On Nov 22, 2006, at 20:48, Leo wrote:
Hi all,
This is just my curiosity. I diff org.el (from emacs) and the one from
Carsten's website. Although they have same version number, I see the
following differences:
While I am not installing new features into the Emacs CVS version
currently,
I s
15 matches
Mail list logo
