[Orgmode] org-add-planning missing a save-restriction.

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Bochannek
$ diff -bu org.el ../org-4.52/org.el --- org.el 2006-10-31 00:12:14.075793700 -0800 +++ ../org-4.52/org.el 2006-10-04 02:14:17.0 -0700 @@ -5487,7 +5487,6 @@ (format-time-string (car org-time-stamp-formats) time)) (setq what nil)) (save-excursion -(save-restriction

[Orgmode] Re: org-add-planning missing a save-restriction.

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Bochannek
Yes, yes, I did the diff backwards - it's late here :-) Alex. Alex Bochannek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > $ diff -bu org.el ../org-4.52/org.el > --- org.el 2006-10-31 00:12:14.075793700 -0800 > > +++ ../org-4.52/org.el 2006-10-04 02:14:17.0 -0700 > @@ -5487,7 +5487,6 @@ > (f

[Orgmode] How about allowing indirect buffers for agenda restriction?

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Bochannek
This is related to the narrowing patch I sent. Basically, I create a indirect buffer clone, which I narrow to my Projects outline, but still want to be able to call agenda commands that limit to the file. Since indirect buffers have no file associated with them, I thought the code below may be suff

[Orgmode] Agenda and tag inheritance.

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Bochannek
Any comments on this? Alex. --- Begin Message --- I am wondering about how tag inheritance is supposed to work in practical terms. I recall that there was some discussion about this in the past, but I don't think there was resolution. I use the default setting of org-use-tag-inheritance t and or

Re: [Orgmode] How about allowing indirect buffers for agenda restriction?

2006-10-31 Thread Carsten Dominik
There is a better way of doing this, which I am implementing for 4.53. Thanks. - Carsten On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:55, Alex Bochannek wrote: This is related to the narrowing patch I sent. Basically, I create a indirect buffer clone, which I narrow to my Projects outline, but still want to be abl

[Orgmode] (org-overlay-put 'display ) does not do much in XEmacs

2006-10-31 Thread Christian Nybø
I run org-clock-display, but the aggregated times aren't shown. I believe that in XEmacs, the function org-overlay-put does not do what the author expects it to when called with the prop argument set to 'display. To Emacs, a prop set to 'display has a particular meaning, but to the XEmacs functio

Re: [Orgmode] (org-overlay-put 'display ) does not do much in XEmacs

2006-10-31 Thread Carsten Dominik
Yes, this part is not yet XEmacs compatible, thank you for the analysis. On Oct 31, 2006, at 14:00, Christian Nybø wrote: I run org-clock-display, but the aggregated times aren't shown. I believe that in XEmacs, the function org-overlay-put does not do what the author expects it to when called

Re: [Orgmode] (org-overlay-put 'display ) does not do much in XEmacs

2006-10-31 Thread Christian Nybø
Thanks for the help. With something along the lines of: (defun org-overlay-put (ovl prop value) (if (featurep 'xemacs) (if (and (stringp value) (eq prop 'display)) (set-extent-properties ovl (list 'invisible t 'end-glyph (make-glyph value)))