Here's one for the list:
Now that we have xhtml output, and CSS support, it might be nice
to introduce support for microformats -- starting with things
like hcard and hcalendar.
> "Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> OK, there is indeed a bug, exposed because
Minor bug (probably introduced by me )--
in xhtml output, non-breaking space is coming out as --
should be
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM:emacspeak GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP:http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/r
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 07:15 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> It seems to me that the logic would be a bit better to schedule these
> show uo as 0:00 and 0:21. If you wanted to put something at midnight
> at the end of the day you would then have to use 24:00 and 24:21.
>
> Opinions?
That's pro
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Should 12am be listed as 0:00 or as 24:00?
> Should 12:21am be listed as 0:21 or as 24:21?
>
I vote for 0:00 and 0:21
Dave in Largo, FL
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to me that the logic would be a bit better to schedule these
> show uo as 0:00 and 0:21. If you wanted to put something at midnight
> at the end of the day you would then have to use 24:00 and 24:21.
>
> Opinions?
That would have the nice ef
On Jun 2, 2006, at 16:11, Michael Olson wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It seems to me that the logic would be a bit better to schedule these
show uo as 0:00 and 0:21. If you wanted to put something at midnight
at the end of the day you would then have to use 24:00 and 24:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, it can be useful to schedule something at 24:21 or even at
> 26:00 or so. because if you put such a date on your agenda for the
> next day, you might find out too late
I see the problem, but I don't like these time formats at all. I'd
pre
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Well, if this is the way things are normally interpreted,
> then this is clearly a bug. Thanks for explaining this to me.
> Strange system. Switching am to pm always makes the event happen later,
> except when the hour is 12.
If 12am/00:00 is considered the start of th
Hi Christian,
thanks for pointing to the relevant standards.
On Jun 2, 2006, at 19:24, Christian Schlauer wrote:
I see the problem, but I don't like these time formats at all. I'd
prefer if the agenda would show me things that are scheduled "early"
the next day (before 06:00, for example, shou
On Jun 2, 2006, at 21:45, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
If 12am/00:00 is considered the start of the day, then the rule
holds -- switching 12am to 12pm makes the event later that same day,
at noon.
Yes, you are right, of course.
Should 12am be listed as 0:00 or as 24:00?
Should 12:21am be liste
I really like the interface Carsten created for visible exports, the one
where you type:
M-x org-export-visible [RET]
and then hit a single key for ascii, html, or whatever. For
consistency, could this same approach be taken for the regular exports
eg. org-export-as-html-and-open?
Than
11 matches
Mail list logo
