Uwe Brauer writes:
>> You can sort alphabetically. But timestamp is considered a part of the
>> headline.
>> If you need something custom, provide custom key/comparison function for
>> `org-sort-entries'.
>
> So you mean I should write a new sort function myself and use advice to
> «connect» it
> Uwe Brauer via "General discussions about Org-mode."
> writes:
> You can sort alphabetically. But timestamp is considered a part of the
> headline.
> If you need something custom, provide custom key/comparison function for
> `org-sort-entries'.
So you mean I should write a new sort function
Uwe Brauer via "General discussions about Org-mode."
writes:
> I am not sure this is a feature or a bug.
> Consider the following
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> * Test 1
> ** <2025-02-08 09:46> First
> ** <2025-02-08 09:51> All
> --8<---cut h
Hi
I am not sure this is a feature or a bug.
Consider the following
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* Test 1
** <2025-02-08 09:46> First
** <2025-02-08 09:51> All
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
If I run `org-sort` the head