On Saturday, 7 Aug 2021 at 22:09, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Would you have an ECM? I cannot reproduce it.
Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce it with emacs -Q [1]. Has to be
something in my configuration but I have no idea what. No time at
present to bisect etc. but I will in due course hopefully.
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> By the way, ox-md also fails if there is a #+bibliography
> line. Removing it allows for the export. Very strange.
Would you have an ECM? I cannot reproduce it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
By the way, ox-md also fails if there is a #+bibliography
line. Removing it allows for the export. Very strange.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 15:41, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> that expects submissions in pandoc (never had this before) which (in
Ignore this, by the way; I meant to type markdown, not pandoc.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest paper written in org: https://a
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 11:29, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Never heard of that before either; very cool!
See my update... markdown, not pandoc. Although pandoc's native
format is quite useful, just not readable. ;-)
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest pap
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 10:41 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
> This is for a journal that expects submissions in pandoc (never had this
> before) which (in
> some ways) is nice as at least it's not Word...
Never heard of that before either; very cool!
Bruce
After some investigation...
It seems that the presence of the #+bibliography: line is what causes
ox-pandoc to fail. Removing this line is sufficient for me to get the
export working.
Thanks again,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
: Latest paper written i
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 17:00, András Simonyi wrote:
> Perhaps a useful workaround would be to first "export to Org" (with
> org-org-export-as-org)?
Excellent suggestion! Thank you.
Doing so clearly indicates that my problem is *not* with org-cite but
with ox-pandoc. Strange.
I had mention
Perhaps a useful workaround would be to first "export to Org" (with
org-org-export-as-org)?
AFAICS this replaces the Org cites with their export
processor-rendered counterparts, e.g.,
with suitable Natbib cite commands when the
#+cite_export: natbib
line is used.
best regards,
András
On Thu, 5 Au
On Thursday, 5 Aug 2021 at 10:13, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Yeah, ideally ox-pandoc would be updated to support org-cite.
Indeed but even exporting without error would be good, assuming of
course that the error I reported is actually due to org-cite. It might
not be; I've never exported to pandoc b
Yeah, ideally ox-pandoc would be updated to support org-cite.
I also, FYI, submitted an issue to pandoc awhile ago to update it's
org-cite support (it has support for an early draft).
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/7329
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 10:07 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
Dear list,
I am needing to export a document, written in org using the new cite
syntax, to pandoc (native). The export fails. I realise that org-cite
is new and I don't expect the export to process any [cite:@key] lines
properly but it would be good to have the export at least generate a
pandoc
12 matches
Mail list logo
