Uwe Brauer writes:
"GdaO" == General discussions about Org-mode writes:
>
>> Limbic answer :
>> - create an emacs-lisp function doing what you want
>> - comment /ad libitum/
>> - call this function in your spreadsheet.
>
> I hoped such a function already existed and somebody would po
>>> "KV" == Karl Voit writes:
Hi Karl,
> Hi Uwe,
> * Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to document or comment such a formula, since I am sure
>> that within days I don't remember why I chose that formula?
> This is not a solution for really complex formulas. However, please
> do note
So long as each piece of documentation has a continuation pointer to the
next piece of documentation in the chain I think that would work.
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >>> "JD" == Jude DaShiell writes:
>
> > Why not use functional narrative form to document complex formulas?
> > form
>>> "JD" == Jude DaShiell writes:
> Why not use functional narrative form to document complex formulas?
> formula name:
> formula function:
> formula uses:
> formula returns:
That would be also nice, however the problem I am facing to have a long
and complicated expression with a lot of ifs, ma
Hi Uwe,
* Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
> Is there any way to document or comment such a formula, since I am sure
> that within days I don't remember why I chose that formula?
This is not a solution for really complex formulas. However, please
do note that standard org has:
Named references: https://orgm
>>> "TV" == Tim Visher writes:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 10:14 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Sorry; I cannot help you directly.
>>
>> My rule of thumb is that if formulas are getting too complex to
>> understand/recall clearly, it's time to use a proper programming
>> language instead. The nice thi
On Monday, 5 Jul 2021 at 10:55, Tim Visher wrote:
> I had never heard of using an org table as input into a source block.
> That's really interesting.
Attached, for illustration, is a simple example, extracted from a paper
I'm currently writing. The "input" to the awk script is the table at
the
Why not use functional narrative form to document complex formulas?
formula name:
formula function:
formula uses:
formula returns:
usually one line of text for each of those. I know, this comes from
structured programming where no block of actual code is supposed to go
above 50 lines and that for
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 10:14 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Sorry; I cannot help you directly.
>
> My rule of thumb is that if formulas are getting too complex to
> understand/recall clearly, it's time to use a proper programming
> language instead. The nice thing about org is you can have tables as
>
>>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes:
> Sorry; I cannot help you directly.
> My rule of thumb is that if formulas are getting too complex to
> understand/recall clearly, it's time to use a proper programming
> language instead. The nice thing about org is you can have tables as
> inputs to and outpu
Sorry; I cannot help you directly.
My rule of thumb is that if formulas are getting too complex to
understand/recall clearly, it's time to use a proper programming
language instead. The nice thing about org is you can have tables as
inputs to and outputs of src blocks...
My papers often have awk
>>> "GdaO" == General discussions about Org-mode writes:
> Limbic answer :
> - create an emacs-lisp function doing what you want
> - comment /ad libitum/
> - call this function in your spreadsheet.
I hoped such a function already existed and somebody would point it out
to me (I searched t
Limbic answer :
- create an emacs-lisp function doing what you want
- comment /ad libitum/
- call this function in your spreadsheet.
HTH,
Hi
It turns out that I have to deal with a bit more complex table formula
of the form
#+begin_src elisp
#+TBLFM: $6=if($2>10,($2-10)*@2$7,0)+ min(10,$2)*@2$2+ min(10,$3)*@2$3 +
if($4>10,($4-10)*@2$7,$4)+min(10,$4)*@2$4 +@2$5*$5;f1
#+end_src
Is there any way to document or comment such a fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
