that is also interesting to know, thanks!
Jack Kamm writes:
> John Kitchin writes:
>
>> If there was a lispy version of make that made this possible, I would
>> use it.
>
> This is an aside, but GNU Make can use Guile Scheme as an embedded
> extension language:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/
John Kitchin writes:
> If there was a lispy version of make that made this possible, I would
> use it.
This is an aside, but GNU Make can use Guile Scheme as an embedded
extension language:
https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Guile-Integration.html
I don't think this solves any
briangpowell . writes:
> "Actually, if it was possible to get M-x compile to run an elisp function
> instead of a make file, it might be all I need, but it looks like it runs
> shell commands."
>
> You probably know this but just in case:
>
> "You can call simulate an EmacsLisp-based script by
Stefan Nobis writes:
> John Kitchin writes:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>
>> This is only semi-on-topic. I am looking for something like M-x compile for
>> my org-files, but I don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles. I am
>> looking for suggestions of existing solutions to this, or thoughts on how
>>
Neil Jerram writes:
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 18:11, John Kitchin wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This is only semi-on-topic. I am looking for something like M-x compile
>> for my org-files, but I don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles. I am
>> looking for suggestions of existing solutions t
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 18:11, John Kitchin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is only semi-on-topic. I am looking for something like M-x compile
> for my org-files, but I don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles. I am
> looking for suggestions of existing solutions to this, or thoughts on how
> to
John Kitchin writes:
> Hi everyone,
> This is only semi-on-topic. I am looking for something like M-x compile for
> my org-files, but I don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles. I am
> looking for suggestions of existing solutions to this, or thoughts on how
> to implement this.
This may not
"Actually, if it was possible to get M-x compile to run an elisp function
instead of a make file, it might be all I need, but it looks like it runs
shell commands."
You probably know this but just in case:
"You can call simulate an EmacsLisp-based script by putting this in a batch
script:
emacs
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 2:39 PM briangpowell .
wrote:
> "don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles"
>
> Why the hey not Dr. Kitchin!?
>
1. I like all the build code in one file that also contains the document I
am building. I know I could put a makefile in a src block and tangle it
before runni
"don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles"
Why the hey not Dr. Kitchin!?
Make is an extremely powerful language
Problem is people make makefiles that are often hard for others to
read--suggest you try hard to keep it simple & avoid the fancy ways of
doing things
Make has flow control & is a v
Hi everyone,
This is only semi-on-topic. I am looking for something like M-x compile for
my org-files, but I don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles. I am
looking for suggestions of existing solutions to this, or thoughts on how
to implement this.
Actually, if it was possible to get M-x compil
11 matches
Mail list logo
