Greetings Bastien.
Bastien writes:
>> Bastien, ob-asymptote is still a part of org-contrib [1]. Should we
>> just go ahead and change the maintainer now?
>>
>> [1] https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-contrib/tree/master/item/lisp/ob-asymptote.el
>
> Yes, done. Thanks Jarmo for taking over the mainten
Hi,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Bastien, ob-asymptote is still a part of org-contrib [1].
> Should we just go ahead and change the maintainer now?
>
> [1] https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-contrib/tree/master/item/lisp/ob-asymptote.el
Yes, done. Thanks Jarmo for taking over the maintenance!
Feel free
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> Greetings Ihor.
>
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Jarmo, did you hear anything from Luc? There was no action in
>> ob-asymptote for over a year. If the current maintainer does not reply
>> to email requests related to ob-asymptote, I'd rather transfer to
>> maintenance to som
Greetings Ihor.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jarmo, did you hear anything from Luc? There was no action in
> ob-asymptote for over a year. If the current maintainer does not reply
> to email requests related to ob-asymptote, I'd rather transfer to
> maintenance to someone more active.
Nope. I sen
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> Greetings Bastien.
>
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Did you manage to get feedback from Luc, maintainer of ob-asymptote.el
>> on org-contrib to decide who will maintain it, where to host it? It
>> seems like having ob-asymptote.el on GNU ELPA would be very good.
I am wondering wh
Greetings Bastien.
Bastien writes:
> Did you manage to get feedback from Luc, maintainer of ob-asymptote.el
> on org-contrib to decide who will maintain it, where to host it? It
> seems like having ob-asymptote.el on GNU ELPA would be very good.
Not yet, but after my recent return from the l
Hi Jarmo,
Jarmo Hurri writes:
>> As maintainer(s) or ob-asymptote.el, the first step should probably be
>> to package it for GNU ELPA: both you and Luc have signed the FSF
>> copyright assignment, so there is no blocker for joining GNU ELPA.
>> Then we can move it out of org-contrib, which just
Greetings Bastien!
Bastien writes:
>> I hereby volunteer to maintain ob-asymptote.el. This file has been
>> moved to org-contrib, but I would like it to be brought back into Org
>> itself.
>
> I added Luc (cc'ed) as the maintainer of ob-asymptote.el a while ago:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.or
Hi Jarmo,
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> I hereby volunteer to maintain ob-asymptote.el. This file has been moved
> to org-contrib, but I would like it to be brought back into Org itself.
I added Luc (cc'ed) as the maintainer of ob-asymptote.el a while ago:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-m
On 27/07/2022 11:09, Tim Cross wrote:
Ihor Radchenko writes:
ob-asymptote has been moved out of the core after
https://orgmode.org/list/87bl9rq29m@gnu.org
Subject: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?
So, we are not talking about adding a new library into the core.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Tim Cross writes:
>
>> As this module has never been part of org core, there is considerable
>> work which would need to be done as a prerequisite e.g. updating the
>> manual and adding documentation and examples, adding unit tests
>> etc. Therefore, I don't think ther
Greetings again, Ihor.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> After removing org-contrib over a year ago, your email is the first
> issue raised regarding ob-asymptote removal.
This is an interesting observation.
I have been using Asymptote with Org all the time, with the latest Org
from ELPA. Only when m
Jarmo Hurri writes:
>> Then, it would help to have more practical examples compared to what
>> we have in
>> https://www.orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-asymptote.html
>
> Absolutely. I have plenty of examples from the domains of math and
> computer science.
Feel free to subm
Jarmo Hurri writes:
>> Then, it would help to have more practical examples compared to what
>> we have in
>> https://www.orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-asymptote.html
>
> Absolutely. I have plenty of examples from the domains of math and
> computer science.
Feel free to subm
Tim Cross writes:
> As this module has never been part of org core, there is considerable
> work which would need to be done as a prerequisite e.g. updating the
> manual and adding documentation and examples, adding unit tests
> etc. Therefore, I don't think there is any need to make a decision o
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Another question is long-term maintainability. We have a limited
> manpower and cannot cater too many support requests or take care about
> parts of code not used by most people. After removing org-contrib over a
> year ago, your email is the first issue raised regardin
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jarmo Hurri writes:
>>> TBH, this is the first time I'm hearing about it. I've looked it
>>> up, and indeed it seems to be useful.
>>
>> For some reason, even people who would certainly benefit from
>> Asymptote often have not heard of it. The developers do not really
>
Hello Munyoki.
Munyoki Kilyungi writes:
>> I do not understand this. Why would supporting a professional-level
>> graphics programming language be distracting someone from their work
>> when using Org?
>
> I'm not _against_ supporting a proffesional-level graphics PL. What
> I'm trying to say
hi, Munyoki,
i'm neutral w.r.t. asymptote support being in "core org" or in
"contrib". but, ...
> I'm not _against_ supporting a proffesional-level
> graphics PL. What I'm trying to say is that
> having it installed should be a choice made by the
> end-user. Personally, I try to keep my system
Jarmo Hurri writes:
>> TBH, this is the first time I'm hearing about it. I've looked it up,
>> and indeed it seems to be useful.
>
> For some reason, even people who would certainly benefit from Asymptote
> often have not heard of it. The developers do not really
> advertise. Asymptote is amaz
Jarmo Hurri anaandika:
> Greetings Munyoki.
>
Hi!
[...]
>> That said, shouldn't this be in org-contrib? Too many features in a
>> tool - featurism - may be distracting, in the sense that you focus
>> more on your tool than work at hand.
>
> I do not understand this. Why would supporting a
Jarmo Hurri anaandika:
> Greetings Munyoki.
>
Hi!
[...]
>> That said, shouldn't this be in org-contrib? Too many features in a
>> tool - featurism - may be distracting, in the sense that you focus
>> more on your tool than work at hand.
>
> I do not understand this. Why would supporting a
Greetings Munyoki.
Munyoki Kilyungi writes:
> Hi Jarmo!
>
> Jarmo Hurri anaandika:
>
>> I hereby volunteer to maintain ob-asymptote.el.
>
> Nice!
>
>> This file has been moved
>> to org-contrib, but I would like it to be brought back into Org itself.
>>
>> I strongly feel that Asymptote is wa
Hi Jarmo!
Jarmo Hurri anaandika:
> Greetings.
>
> I hereby volunteer to maintain ob-asymptote.el.
Nice!
> This file has been moved
> to org-contrib, but I would like it to be brought back into Org itself.
>
> I strongly feel that Asymptote is way too valuable as a scientific tool
> to be drop
Greetings.
I hereby volunteer to maintain ob-asymptote.el. This file has been moved
to org-contrib, but I would like it to be brought back into Org itself.
I strongly feel that Asymptote is way too valuable as a scientific tool
to be dropped out of Org.
All the best,
Jarmo
25 matches
Mail list logo
