Re: Towards a new TeX font management

My fault... /PA On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 18:12, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 23/04/2025 23:08, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez wrote: > > +++ b/lisp/org.el > > > - '(;; amsmath before fontspec for lualatex and xetex > > -("" "amsmath" t ("lualatex" "xetex")) > > Does it mean that you are going

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

Max Nikulin writes: > On 23/04/2025 23:08, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez wrote: >> +++ b/lisp/org.el > >> - '(;; amsmath before fontspec for lualatex and xetex >> -("" "amsmath" t ("lualatex" "xetex")) > > Does it mean that you are going to remove amsmath even for pdflatex? No. The pa

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

On 23/04/2025 23:08, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez wrote: +++ b/lisp/org.el - '(;; amsmath before fontspec for lualatex and xetex -("" "amsmath" t ("lualatex" "xetex")) Does it mean that you are going to remove amsmath even for pdflatex? P.S. I was confused concerning mathspec be

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

In the final version, it will be unicode-math for xetex and lualatex. I recently learnt through Ihor that mathspec is deprecated. Thx, /PA On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 17:19, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 23/04/2025 22:36, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH] Use the same packages as p

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

On 23/04/2025 22:36, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Use the same packages as pandoc Preparing the font management infrastructure, align with pandoc * lisp/org.el: org-latex-default-packages-alist use the same packages as pandoc. It seems a well-accepted standard for fonts

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

Thanks a ton! /PA On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 10:20, Robert Klein wrote: > Hi, > > you don't need to usepackage textcomp anymore since the spring 2020 > release of LaTeX, see > https://www.latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews31.pdf page three, > right column. > > Best regards > Robert > > On We

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

Hi, you don't need to usepackage textcomp anymore since the spring 2020 release of LaTeX, see https://www.latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews31.pdf page three, right column. Best regards Robert On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:31:12 + Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez w

Fwd: Towards a new TeX font management

-- Forwarded message - From: Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 17:58 Subject: Re: Towards a new TeX font management To: Ihor Radchenko No, you suggested to use unicode-math for xetex and lualatex and it is fine with me. Best, /PA On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez writes: > here is my first patch in the process of coming closer to pandoc's way of > managing fonts for LaTeX export. > ... Didn't you already send this exact patch? See https://list.orgmode.org/877c3flzv0.fsf@localhost/T/#m56e31ee64e33df06eb8073c57ac0af5aaf4212fd

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez writes: > This should be the good one. Apologies... Thanks! > Subject: [PATCH] Update org-latex-default-packages-alist > > * lisp/org.el: org-latex-default-packages-alist uses the same packages Please follow the changelog format as described in https://orgmode.org

Re: Towards a new TeX font management

This should be the good one. Apologies... /PA On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 18:00, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez writes: > > > No, you suggested to use unicode-math for xetex and lualatex and it is > > fine with me. > > But the patch you submitted still has > > +("" "

Towards a new TeX font management

Hi Ihor, here is my first patch in the process of coming closer to pandoc's way of managing fonts for LaTeX export. Best, /PA -- Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler Sagen's Paradeiser, write BE! Year 1 of the New Koprocracy From 7