Am 01.10.2021 um 10:42 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello,
Denis Maier writes:
So, you're suggesting that locator parsing algorithm should be ported
to oc-biblatex instead?
That's a possibility. It can be factored out from oc-csl.el and become
a generic tool living in oc.el, if deemed useful.
Hello,
Denis Maier writes:
> So, you're suggesting that locator parsing algorithm should be ported
> to oc-biblatex instead?
That's a possibility. It can be factored out from oc-csl.el and become
a generic tool living in oc.el, if deemed useful. The algorithm can trip
over locators involving le
Am 30.09.2021 um 09:23 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello,
Denis Maier writes:
Well, there are even cases like this one:
[cite:@doe especially 4, 12, and 15]
[cite:@doe e.g. 4, 12, and 15]
[cite:@doe among others 4, 12, and 15]
[cite:@doe 4, but also 12 and 15]
AFAIU, all these cases are
Hello,
Denis Maier writes:
> Well, there are even cases like this one:
>
> [cite:@doe especially 4, 12, and 15]
>
> [cite:@doe e.g. 4, 12, and 15]
>
> [cite:@doe among others 4, 12, and 15]
>
> [cite:@doe 4, but also 12 and 15]
AFAIU, all these cases are already handled by the locator parsing
a
Am 29.09.2021 um 08:30 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
That won't work if you have more than one reference in a citation?
[cite:@doe 4, with some more text; @jones]
No, that won't work with more than one reference in a citation. But
this, coupled with the simple loca
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> That won't work if you have more than one reference in a citation?
>
> [cite:@doe 4, with some more text; @jones]
No, that won't work with more than one reference in a citation. But
this, coupled with the simple locator parsing done in oc-csl.el should
be enough
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:42 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Bastien writes:
>
> > Denis Maier writes:
> >
> >> I think the suffix parsing in oc-biblatex could be improved.
> >
> > Can you provide a patch for this?
>
> I don't think this improvement is needed. We could get away with it
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> Denis Maier writes:
>
>> I think the suffix parsing in oc-biblatex could be improved.
>
> Can you provide a patch for this?
I don't think this improvement is needed. We could get away with it in
most cases using, e.g., global suffix:
[cite:@doe 4; with some more te
Hi Denis,
Denis Maier writes:
> I think the suffix parsing in oc-biblatex could be improved.
Can you provide a patch for this?
--
Bastien
Bump
Am 08.09.2021 um 15:37 schrieb Denis Maier:
Hi,
I think the suffix parsing in oc-biblatex could be improved. Consider
this example:
#+cite_export: biblatex authoryear
[cite:@doe 4]
[cite:@doe 4, with some more text]
Hi,
I think the suffix parsing in oc-biblatex could be improved. Consider
this example:
#+cite_export: biblatex authoryear
[cite:@doe 4]
[cite:@doe 4, with some more text]
=
This gives us
==
11 matches
Mail list logo
