Re: Status of syntax specification

> It would need proof reading, and comparing with "org-element.el", the > actual implementation of the syntax. Formalization may be better better, > too. I didn't know that there was a single point of entry to parse elements. I think my first step will be to try to write spec tests in elisp then.

Re: Status of syntax specification

Hello, "Gerry Agbobada" writes: > I found on Worg a "draft" for org syntax description : > https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html > > Do you think this paper marked as draft is good enough to use as > a source to make a parser ? It is "good enough", but possibly slightly inaccurate at so

Status of syntax specification

Hello, I found on Worg a "draft" for org syntax description : https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html Do you think this paper marked as draft is good enough to use as a source to make a parser ? I think it'd be nice to try to finalize this ;