Thanks Jack for the helpful response and support of my assessment.
I do intend to fix this as part of my ongoing (but currently delayed)
work on improving agenda sorting and adding an option to manually sort.
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 07:07, Jack Kamm wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> > I further noticed that
Hi Adam,
> I further noticed that this overloading of the internal priority by
> including timestamp and habit data causes disruption to the behaviour
> I imagine most users would expect from `org-agenda-sorting-strategy'.
> For example, if you have `priority-down' as the first entry in the
> `age
Thanks a lot - appreciate the feedback!
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 23:38, Samuel Wales wrote:
> if my opinion is worth anything [perhaps not much here :]], i like
> your proposals and the idea of being able to re-sort an existing
> agenda assuming that is your goal.
>
> i don't use any priority sort
if my opinion is worth anything [perhaps not much here :]], i like
your proposals and the idea of being able to re-sort an existing
agenda assuming that is your goal.
i don't use any priority sorting except in user-customizable but it
makes sense to decouple them for those who do. and i frequentl
Hi again,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:20:53PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently working on adding a feature to org-agenda which allows
manual ordering of entries in combination with the existing automatic
ordering (as dictated by `org-agenda-sorting-strategy').
During my inves
