Daniel Kraus writes:
>> Even if it is the case, it is still worth checking :results table
>> parsing. nils might be slurped when converting output to tables.
>
> Right.
> I just double checked the results for value and table results with
> different Clojure backends and it worked in all cases (th
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> #+RESULTS:
>> : nil is falsey
>
> Even if it is the case, it is still worth checking :results table
> parsing. nils might be slurped when converting output to tables.
Right.
I just double checked the results for value and table results with
different Clojure backends
Daniel Kraus writes:
> The results you get from a ob-clojure block got re-worked recently.
> That `:results value` returned ALL values and not only the last one
> was actually a bug.
> Can you try again with the latest org (/ob-clojure) version?
> You should now only get:
>
> #+RESULTS:
> : nil i
Hi!
r...@devsphoto.com writes:
> The quoted NIL is not showing on the Result block.
>
> Org mode version 9.6.1 (9.6.1-??-fe92a3ced @
> /Users/rafiks/.emacs.d/.local/straight/build-28.2/org/)
>
> #+begin_src clojure :results value
> (nil? 1)
> (nil? nil)
> (if "bears eat beets"
>
