Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Do you think it is worth it?
IMHO no, unless there are many requests to use Worgs content under CC
BY-SA 4.0 that I'm not aware of.
--
Bastien
Bastien Guerry writes:
> If a text is published under two different licenses, the user can choose
> between them: if he chooses CC BY SA 4.0, he must abide by CC BY SA 4.0;
> if he chooses GNU FDL 1.3+, he must abide by GNU FDL 1.3+. He does not
> choose both *at the same time*.
>
> If he clones
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> However, I am still puzzled how different licenses may apply to the
> exact same text. In particular, it is not clear how the contradictions
> between licenses are handled in such scenario. (Or are you saying that
> CC BY SA 4.0 is fully compatible with GNU DFL
