Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Sean Whitton writes: > the best I can come up with is > > (defface org-hide > 'background light) (type ns)) (:foreground "white")) > (((background light) (type w32)) (:foreground "white")) > (((background dark) (type ns)) (:foreground "black")) > (((backgroun

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Hello, On Sun 27 Jul 2025 at 06:25pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun 27 Jul 2025 at 05:18pm GMT, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > >> Sean Whitton writes: >> Looking at it now, it probably is safer to just ':inherit fixed-pitch'. It might not look nice on some platforms, though this

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Hello, On Sun 27 Jul 2025 at 05:18pm GMT, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >>> Looking at it now, it probably is safer to just ':inherit fixed-pitch'. It >>> might not look nice on some platforms, though this should be fixed >>> elsewhere. The goal is to avoid combining outline and

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Sean Whitton writes: >> Looking at it now, it probably is safer to just ':inherit fixed-pitch'. It >> might not look nice on some platforms, though this should be fixed >> elsewhere. The goal is to avoid combining outline and bitmap fonts, if >> possible, especially given the default white backgr

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Hello, On Thu 24 Jul 2025 at 09:57am +03, Protesilaos Stavrou wrote: > If I remember correctly, the problem back then had to do with the meaning of > the "Monospace" font on some GNU/Linux distributions (maybe it was on Debian, > but I am not sure anymore). No, that's a distinct issue. Please ta

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

On 2025-07-23 16:06, Sean Whitton wrote: Hello, Hello Sean and everybody! On Mon 21 Jul 2025 at 08:13pm GMT, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Sean Whitton writes: I couldn't find any mailing list discussion as to why commit 667cb6f1a was reverted (in commit 8aff82568). I think that at least org-v

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Hello, On Mon 21 Jul 2025 at 08:13pm GMT, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> I couldn't find any mailing list discussion as to why commit 667cb6f1a >> was reverted (in commit 8aff82568). >> >> I think that at least org-verbatim and org-code should clearly inherit >> from fixed-pit

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Ihor Radchenko writes: > That was on Windows 10, AFAIR. According > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Windows_usage_share, it is still > ~half of all Windows machines. And I have no clue if the situation is > any better on Windows 11. So, I do not think that it is a good idea. > (Also, same

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Bastien Guerry writes: >> The reverting has been requested by Prots because fixed pitch fonts are >> not very good on Windows, AFAIR. >> See >> https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/1758826875.387473.1633124447...@mail1.libero.it/ > > Thanks for the link. That was about four years ago: perhaps the > si

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Hi, Ihor Radchenko writes: > The reverting has been requested by Prots because fixed pitch fonts are > not very good on Windows, AFAIR. > See > https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/1758826875.387473.1633124447...@mail1.libero.it/ Thanks for the link. That was about four years ago: perhaps the situat

Re: Revert of commit "org-faces.el: Use fixed-pitch"

Sean Whitton writes: > I couldn't find any mailing list discussion as to why commit 667cb6f1a > was reverted (in commit 8aff82568). > > I think that at least org-verbatim and org-code should clearly inherit > from fixed-pitch. But I assume there was some bug which became apparent > after Prot's