Kyle Meyer writes:
> That sounds reasonable to me, and the change looks fine to me. My only
> thought is that perhaps the line number would be friendlier to report,
> but I don't feel strongly about that.
>
> I'll wait a few days for any babel users to chime in and then apply
> (unless you reply
On Wednesday, 30 Sep 2020 at 12:57, TEC wrote:
> +1 for line numbers
Likewise.
And, just to be greedy, the name of the source block as well would be
very useful (if present). I do tend to name all of my blocks, if only
to help with navigation by being able to jump to any block from anywhere
else
Kyle Meyer writes:
That sounds reasonable to me, and the change looks fine to me.
My only
thought is that perhaps the line number would be friendlier to
report,
but I don't feel strongly about that.
+1 for line numbers
Assuming the current format is something like:
"Do you want to eval
Thanks for the patch, and sorry for the very delayed response.
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> Greetings.
>
> Please find attached a patch that adds the point of the source code
> block to the message shown to user when confirming the evaluation of the
> block.
>
> In large org-files, I have often trouble
