Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html#FOOT28
>>
>> Unless I miss something, this footnote is plain wrong. The timestamps
>> are not removed. At least not when I run M-x org-store-link on a
>> headline with timestamp with emacs -Q.
>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Done.
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=0641ece57b9d980b63e3a3bb6dc4d467eff3051b
>
> I also documented this in doc/Documentation_Standards.org
Great, thank you.
>>> Also, there is one footnote that is indexed (does it even work?):
>>
>> A
Bastien writes:
> Hi Ihor,
>
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Should we just inline the one-sentence footnotes?
>
> Yes, this would be a progress already.
Done.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=0641ece57b9d980b63e3a3bb6dc4d467eff3051b
I also documented this in doc/D
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Should we just inline the one-sentence footnotes?
Yes, this would be a progress already.
> Also, there is one footnote that is indexed (does it even work?):
AFACT it does not work and I think it should not work, we can remove
these index entries.
--
Bastie
Bastien writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Do you have any suggestion on how to deal with changing footnotes in the
>> manual? When I delete this footnote, all the footnotes must be
>> re-numbered creating a lot of garbage in the diff. Is it ok? Or should
>> we prefer inline footnote definiti
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Do you have any suggestion on how to deal with changing footnotes in the
> manual? When I delete this footnote, all the footnotes must be
> re-numbered creating a lot of garbage in the diff. Is it ok? Or should
> we prefer inline footnote definitions in the manual to avoi
