Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>
>> `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize
>> but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests
>> for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether.
>
> Hmm... Or
Hi All,
I'm currently traveling, but it seems like it would be good to chime in here.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, at 5:22 PM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Bastien Guerry writes:
>
>> If not, then relying on engrave-faces, which is maintained and also
>> handles LaTeX, instead of htmlize, sounds like a good
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Bastien Guerry writes:
>
>> If not, then relying on engrave-faces, which is maintained and also
>> handles LaTeX, instead of htmlize, sounds like a good idea.
>
> I'd like to hear Timothy's opinion on this. He is the author of
> engrave-faces and the maintainer of ox-htm
Bastien Guerry writes:
> It looks like engrave-faces already does a better job than htmlize.el,
> and does it for LaTeX too, I see no drawback in using engrave-faces as
> a replacement of htmlize.el. Are there any?
engrave-faces is technically in "beta".
(https://github.com/tecosaur/engrave-fac
Bastien Guerry writes:
> If not, then relying on engrave-faces, which is maintained and also
> handles LaTeX, instead of htmlize, sounds like a good idea.
I'd like to hear Timothy's opinion on this. He is the author of
engrave-faces and the maintainer of ox-html.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> That's what I meant. The latest thread named some issue with fine-tuning
> the output and never got any follow-up.
(Please ignore my suggestion to explore the htmlfontify.el scenario.)
>>> As for engrave-faces, it is working for both LaTeX and HTML export.
>>
>> Would t
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> That's fine to install htmlize. Org relies upon htmlize for certain
> features, including HTML export.
A while ago, it has been suggested to rely on htmlfontify.el, which is
part of Emacs core, instead of htmlize.el.
Maybe this is still relevant?
If not, then relying o
Philip Kaludercic writes:
>> Nicolas once tried to port htmlize support into htmlfontify [1], but it
>> did not go well [2].
>>
>> [1] https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/874lnw5rfi@nicolasgoaziou.fr/
>> [2] https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/874ldzovv4@nicolasgoaziou.fr/
>
> How come you infe
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Philip Kaludercic writes:
>
>>> We might consider extending engrave-faces to cover all the htmlize
>>> features.
>>
>> Perhaps I missed something, but is there an issue with the built-in
>> `htmlfontify'?
>
> Org uses htmlize historically.
> Nicolas once tried to port ht
Philip Kaludercic writes:
>> We might consider extending engrave-faces to cover all the htmlize
>> features.
>
> Perhaps I missed something, but is there an issue with the built-in
> `htmlfontify'?
Org uses htmlize historically.
Nicolas once tried to port htmlize support into htmlfontify [1], bu
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>
>> `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize
>> but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests
>> for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether.
>
> Hmm... Or
Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>> Hmm... Org has built-in htmlize support and I did not know that it is
>> not maintained actively.
>
> I only installed htmlize because org-html-fontify-code told me to do so.
> Should it not have done that? I did not have any version of htmlize
> installed prior to thi
[fyi that is probably not related: i use htmlize.el for functions it
has that allow you to copy a region omitting invisible parts. e.g.
partly folded magit. i haven't found other code that workd for that
and myb rain could not construct any.]
On 8/13/23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Jonas Bernoulli
13 matches
Mail list logo
