Tom Gillespie writes:
>This fixes the issue on my system, and looking over the bisected
> commit it looks like the ^ was just an oversight. This also resolves
> the issue for <> as well, I don't think we need a
> separate test case for that since any issue with references breaking
> should sho
Hi Kyle,
This fixes the issue on my system, and looking over the bisected
commit it looks like the ^ was just an oversight. This also resolves
the issue for <> as well, I don't think we need a
separate test case for that since any issue with references breaking
should show up elsewhere (though I
