Tom Gillespie writes:
> Here's the rebased patch. It should apply without issue. Best!
Applied.
https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-contrib/commit/b6712e688b3a54c54b80ab34525d4672ff2a8d7a
Marcel, note that your recent patch has been overwritten. Let me know if
you have any objections.
Also, if you see
Here's the rebased patch. It should apply without issue. Best!
Tom
From 5247d2459800f82434f1bc3aeea136c18af7923c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gillespie
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 01:02:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] lisp/org-expiry.el: Account for org-time-stamp-formats
refactor
* lisp/org-expiry.el
Tom Gillespie writes:
> Looks like string-replace doesn't support that notation,
> so both too aggressive and without sufficient control.
> I've switched to replace-regexp-in-string which does
> what we want.
>
> Here's the updated patch.
Thanks!
Note that your patch does not apply onto master.
Looks like string-replace doesn't support that notation,
so both too aggressive and without sufficient control.
I've switched to replace-regexp-in-string which does
what we want.
Here's the updated patch.
From 12ca29965e867acd64fecaecd14f2f74e90d7e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Gillespie
D
Tom Gillespie writes:
> + (format-time-string
> + (string-replace "<" ""
> + (string-replace ">" "" (cdr
> org-time-stamp-formats)
`string-replace' is very aggressive. You may want something like "\\`<"
and "\\'>", matching on
Here is an updated patch. Best!
Tom
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:42 AM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>
> Tom Gillespie writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >Here is a patch for org-contrib/lisp/org-expiry.el to account for
> > recent changes to org-time-stamp-formats. Best,
> > Tom
> >
> > PS is this list still the best
Tom Gillespie writes:
> Hi,
>Here is a patch for org-contrib/lisp/org-expiry.el to account for
> recent changes to org-time-stamp-formats. Best,
> Tom
>
> PS is this list still the best place to send org-contrib patches?
Yes, this list is suitable as long as org-expiry is orphaned.
For the
