Max Nikulin writes:
> Do you have any arguments against switching from emacs -Q to emacs -q? I
> am still unsure if it is safe enough, but not doing it is not better. I
> am considering adding -q to this script when it is called directly.
> Unfortunately Emacs does not have an option to overri
On 04/05/2023 17:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
For those who are not familiar with convention any target may be
specified in docs, keeping usual meaning of the default "all" target.
I am mostly concerned about the existing users who are already settled
on running the default "m
Max Nikulin writes:
>> Good idea. Although, we should not overdo this package management thing.
>> If we really need complex functionality here, we should better just use
>> cask/eldev instead of re-inventing the wheel.
>
> I have not tried cask or eldev, so I can not reason on supposed workflow.
