Re: [PATCH] Have org-string-width's temporary buffer be declared as such

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >>> - (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create " *Org string width*") >>> + (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create " *Org string width*" t) >> >> ... just one problem - `get-buffer-create' in Emacs 27 does not yet have >> the second opt

Re: [PATCH] Have org-string-width's temporary buffer be declared as such

Ihor Radchenko writes: >> - (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create " *Org string width*") >> + (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create " *Org string width*" t) > > ... just one problem - `get-buffer-create' in Emacs 27 does not yet have > the second optional argument. And we still supp

Re: [PATCH] Have org-string-width's temporary buffer be declared as such

Jules Tamagnan writes: > I hope this email finds you well. This is my first time contributing to > this mailing list attempting to contribute to org-mode, so hopefully I > do this correctly. Welcome! You do not have to do everything correctly beforehand and alone. We will tell you if something n

Re: [PATCH] Have org-string-width's temporary buffer be declared as such

Jules Tamagnan writes: > I was wondering if there was anything I could do to help get this patch > reviewed and, after any required tweaks, integrated. I don't know about > best practices and expectations yet so figured I would bump to learn more. > Thanks in advance. Just wait a little. It is o

Re: [PATCH] Have org-string-width's temporary buffer be declared as such

Hi all, I was wondering if there was anything I could do to help get this patch reviewed and, after any required tweaks, integrated. I don't know about best practices and expectations yet so figured I would bump to learn more. Thanks in advance. Best, Jules On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 11:38 AM Jules