Ah.
My bad. Of course that's not how to set the property.
#+PROPERTY: COOKIE_DATA recursive
works great.
Alexander
On 5/21/09, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On May 20, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Alexander wrote:
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> It works great. However, I can't get it to work on a per-file basis,
>> ie
On May 20, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Alexander wrote:
Thanks!
It works great. However, I can't get it to work on a per-file basis,
ie with:
#+COOKIE_DATA: recursive
What makes you think this should work?
But: This is a property which is inherited, so I think
#+PROPERTY: COOKIE_DATA recursive
Thanks!
It works great. However, I can't get it to work on a per-file basis, ie with:
#+COOKIE_DATA: recursive
It works fine for my purposes - I just set it on a per-tree basis, but
I don't know if this is desired behavior or not.
Best,
Alexander
On 5/20/09, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Alexa
Hi Alexander,
in the latest git version you can do
(setq org-hierarchical-todo-statistics nil)
Or, if you want this only for specific trees, you can
set a property[1]
:COOKIE_DATA: todo recursive
HTH
- Carsten
[1] The "todo" part in the property is unnecessary if the
entry does not have
Hi,
I've now switched to following the development version because several
things that I've wanted have been implemented in the short time I've
been using org-mode already! And I was impressed with orgmode at the
outset...
I tried version 6.26trans, and the hierarchical checkbox statistics
works
We have had the same discussion recently about checkboxes,
and added a variable org-hierarchical-checkbox-statistics.
However, my personal view is that the outline hierarchy is
different, because if you are organizing tasks into a hierarchy,
so it does not make sense to add TODO's on different le