On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
A couple of sorting-related issues, under a different subject header
so as not to get confused with the issues in the previous one.
1.
It looks like "priority" means both priority /letter/ and
priority /as calculated/.
This is correct, and in
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 04:53, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> you can now et faces for each priority, using the variable
> org-priority-faces, in a way similar to the todo-keyword faces,
> and the tag faces. Just note that the car in this alist must be
> a character, not a string.
This is much better,
On Mar 3, 2009, at 5:09 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Hi Carsten,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22, Carsten Dominik
wrote:
1) priority faces are settable in the agenda. perhaps
they could be so in the outline also.
This seems more confusing than useful to me. In the agenda,
all the tasks are t
Hi Carsten,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> 1) priority faces are settable in the agenda. perhaps
>> they could be so in the outline also.
>
> This seems more confusing than useful to me. In the agenda,
> all the tasks are together, so it does make some sense to
> cha
Hi Samuel,
On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:36 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Here are some possible ways that the outline and the agenda
could be made slightly more consistent. Hope I didn't miss
any that already exist.
1) priority faces are settable in the agenda. perhaps
they could be so in the outline a
