Sounds good. Thanks!
On 7/10/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately I have also not found a better solution. So
it now should use the base buffer, and widen it if necessary.
- Carsten
On Mar 28, 2007, at 0:34, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I found a bug involving
Unfortunately I have also not found a better solution. So
it now should use the base buffer, and widen it if necessary.
- Carsten
On Mar 28, 2007, at 0:34, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug involving indirect buffers when following links. If
I have one file with a link to a second
