On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:11:16 -0500
Nick Dokos wrote:
> This is with hindsight 20/20 but here is a method for finding such
> things, using only emacs: C-h v org- then switch to the
> *Completions* buffer and search for ``emphasis''. The third hit is
> org-hide-emphasis-markers - and you don't have
I wish all the groups I was involved with suffered this "problem." :-)
Cheers.
Fil
On 26 February 2011 11:00, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Filippo,
>
> "Filippo A. Salustri" writes:
>
> > yeah, right, make me feel even dumber
> > ...wait, let me just wipe the egg off my face :-)
>
> Well, the
Hi Filippo,
"Filippo A. Salustri" writes:
> yeah, right, make me feel even dumber
> ...wait, let me just wipe the egg off my face :-)
Well, the real "problem" here is that the community is so prompt to
reply that it doesn't encourage people not to be lazy :)
Best,
--
Bastien
_
yeah, right, make me feel even dumber
...wait, let me just wipe the egg off my face :-)
Cheers.
Fil
On 25 February 2011 22:11, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Filippo A. Salustri wrote:
>
> > I did try to google a few things, but "hide" was never one of my
> keywords.
> > Sigh.
> > Google is grea
Filippo A. Salustri wrote:
> I did try to google a few things, but "hide" was never one of my keywords.
> Sigh.
> Google is great IFF you know what keywords to use.
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
> Cheers.
> Fil
>
> On 25 February 2011 18:11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> >>
> >> So I was wondering
I did try to google a few things, but "hide" was never one of my keywords.
Sigh.
Google is great IFF you know what keywords to use.
Thanks for the pointer.
Cheers.
Fil
On 25 February 2011 18:11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 25.2.2011, at 19:22, Filippo A. Salustri wrote:
>
> So,
>> I really l
On 25.2.2011, at 19:22, Filippo A. Salustri wrote:
So,
I really like the emphasis bit that org-emphasis-alist gets me.
But I find that the key characters to do the emphasis, as in /
italics/, remain visible.
It's distracting to me. I mean, since it's rendered in italics,
it's redundant to s
