William Henney wrote:
>Hi all
>I have recently started using org-indent (together with word-wrap) for
>new org files. In general, I love it. But there are a couple of small
>problems:
>2. org-indent fails to play nicely with org-inlinetask in two ways
> i) It destroys the special fontificatio
William Henney wrote:
>Consider what one would want to happen when
>org-indent-indentation-per-level = 1 (which is what I prefer):
>Indentation of 0
>* Level one heading
> Indentation of 2
>** Level two heading
> Indentation of 3
>*** Level three heading
>Indentation of 4
>So, the desired
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:10 PM, William Henney wrote:
> Indentation of 0
> * Level one heading
> Indentation of 2
> ** Level two heading
> Indentation of 3
> *** Level three heading
> Indentation of 4
This is very odd - gmail ate my spaces! What I actually typed was the
following (spaces s
Hi David
Thanks for looking at this.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:02 AM, David Maus wrote:
> William Henney wrote:
>>Hi all
>
>>1. If one sets org-indent-indentation-per-level to any value other
>>than the default of 2, then the indentation of lines following a
>>heading is not correct. I seem to h
William Henney wrote:
>Hi all
>1. If one sets org-indent-indentation-per-level to any value other
>than the default of 2, then the indentation of lines following a
>heading is not correct. I seem to have managed to fix this by changing
>line 231 of org-indent.el from
>n (* (or lev
Fixed I hope) in 5.13e.
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:54 PM, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
As of 5.13 I am unable to schedule or set deadlines other than
tomorrow. I thought this must be something in my settings but
running emacs with -q and loading org without any special settings
"Scott Jaderholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As of 5.13 I am unable to schedule or set deadlines other than
> tomorrow. I thought this must be something in my settings but running
> emacs with -q and loading org without any special settings yields the
> same bug. Is anyone else having this prob
On May 30, 2007, at 16:45, Leo wrote:
Dear Carsen,
1. unnecessary point movement
When 'S-tab' (visibility cycling), the `point' (cursor) will be moved
to
the first headline, which will be a surprise to users. I think the
movement should be kept as minimal as possible i.e. it should be kept
