Carsten Dominik writes:
> I have implemented a different fix for the problem Sebastian mentions.
> Hopefully it will work correctly, please test.
Yes does :-)
Thanks Carsten!
--
Sebastian Rose, EMMA STIL - mediendesign, Niemeyerstr.6, 30449 Hannover
Tel.: +49 (0)511 - 36 58 472
Fax: +49 (
I have implemented a different fix for the problem Sebastian mentions.
Hopefully it will work correctly, please test.
- Carsten
On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Hi,
This solves the problem with the inside a . That is
only
created when images are included using `org-ex
Rustom Mody writes:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> This solves the problem with the inside a . That is only
>> created when images are included using `org-export-html-format-image'.
>
> Does this solve the original problem (unicode boxes on printing?)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This solves the problem with the inside a . That is only
> created when images are included using `org-export-html-format-image'.
Does this solve the original problem (unicode boxes on printing?)
There are also errors in the j
Hi,
This solves the problem with the inside a . That is only
created when images are included using `org-export-html-format-image'.
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index 760c83f..4f035a4 100644
--- a/lisp/org-exp.el
+++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
@@ -3638,8 +3638,10 @@ lang=\"%s\"
Hi,
Seems there are some regressions/new issues. XHTML-validity is a moving
target and someting to re-work from time to time.
It's actually quite seldom I have these problems with the current
version.
I only found this one on the first glance:
* is _not_ allowed in
=> --->8---
I tried validating this at http://validator.w3.org/
and its not valid XHTML.
Dont know more HTML to comment :-)
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
> Hi Rustom,
>
>
> "Rustom Mody" writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Sebastian Rose
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hm - we do not
Hi Rustom,
"Rustom Mody" writes:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>>
>> Hm - we do not provide a special stylesheet for printing. But since
>
>>
>> Maybe we should add this line to the very top of the document:
>>
>>
>
> I tried adding this by hand (using emacs) it mad
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
> Hm - we do not provide a special stylesheet for printing. But since
>
> Maybe we should add this line to the very top of the document:
>
>
I tried adding this by hand (using emacs) it made no difference to the printout
The boxes show th
Hm - we do not provide a special stylesheet for printing. But since
there is no `...@media screen' somewhere in the stylesheet, it should just
work for all medias (and does so here).
But still, in case of interest:
http://www.w3schools.com/CSS/css_mediatypes.asp
Maybe we should add this line
--- Lun 19/1/09, Rustom Mody ha scritto:
> When I print (to hardcopy) org documents like
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-custom-agenda-commands.php
> (but not only this one) from firefox, the lines such as
>
> M-x customize-variable RET org-agenda-custom-commands
>
> viz the lines en
11 matches
Mail list logo
