On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> When refiling an already existing note (using C-c C-w), then RET works.
>> However, when filing a new note created by org-remember (using C-c C-
>> c),
>> RET merely prompts me with the possible next-level headings. Pressing
>> SPACE and then RET files
On Jan 15, 2010, at 3:35 PM, John Rakestraw wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Do you need to press SPACE, or does RET also do the trick? Because,
as
Manish points out in another message, SPC should really be allowed as
a character in a new headline you define. Apparently right now it is
not a
On Jun 25, 2010, at 6:01 PM, John Rakestraw wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Carsten Dominik wrote:
When refiling an already existing note (using C-c C-w), then RET
works.
However, when filing a new note created by org-remember (using C-c
C-
c),
RET merely prompts me with the possible next-leve
On Jan 15, 2010, at 3:35 PM, John Rakestraw wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Do you need to press SPACE, or does RET also do the trick? Because,
as
Manish points out in another message, SPC should really be allowed as
a character in a new headline you define. Apparently right now it is
not a
> Carsten Dominik writes:
> Do you need to press SPACE, or does RET also do the trick? Because, as
> Manish points out in another message, SPC should really be allowed as
> a character in a new headline you define. Apparently right now it is
> not allowed as it is treated as a completion comma
On Jan 13, 2010, at 8:07 PM, John Rakestraw wrote:
Richard Riley writes:
That is fine and as expected. My point is more that I am unable to
file to linux.org/general since it has elements filed there. It
offers
me to select an actual existing org item as opposed to letting me
store the re
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
[...]
>
> Also thanks to the others - I used manish' funtion to toggle category
> appearance and I changed my categories to be more "Pretty Printing" for
> the agenda e.g
>
> :CATEGORY:The XyZ Project
>
The function is credit to Manuel Hermengi
> Richard Riley writes:
> That is fine and as expected. My point is more that I am unable to
> file to linux.org/general since it has elements filed there. It offers
> me to select an actual existing org item as opposed to letting me
> store the rewritten item to linux.org/general.
Not sure I
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Hopefully this is related to the agenda navigation (RET/TAB on an
>> agenda
>> item) goes to the wrong place issue we've seen in the past.
>
> I don't think this is related, unfortunately, because this was
> specific
On Aug 28, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
[long description omitted]
I'll be _really_ happy when Carsten squashes this bug :)
Well, in that case I wish you a happy day. Lets hope that his was
the same bug
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Aug 27, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
> [long description omitted]
>
>>
>> I'll be _really_ happy when Carsten squashes this bug :)
>
> Well, in that case I wish you a happy day. Lets hope that his was
> the same bug that others have seen.
>
> Thank you *ve
On Aug 27, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
[long description omitted]
I'll be _really_ happy when Carsten squashes this bug :)
Well, in that case I wish you a happy day. Lets hope that his was
the same bug that others have seen.
Thank you *very* much for your persistence and the uns
Bernt Hansen wrote:
> I think I have something that is reproducible.
>
...reproduction case elided...
>
> I'll be _really_ happy when Carsten squashes this bug :)
>
Wow! I just *had* to try it for myself: works exactly as you describe.
Nick
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
