Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Vauban writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> Sébastien Vauban writes:
>>> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
"Eric Schulte" writes:
[...]
> Now (I've done some changes, explained below), I can...
>
> Stored: Header
> Stored: Condition to be satisfied
> Stored: File
Hi Sébastien,
Thanks for giving this a try, comments below...
Sébastien Vauban writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> "Eric Schulte" writes:
[...]
>>> As source-code blocks are already named in the current org-babel setup this
>>> wouldn't be a very significant change. Once this is
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:01:36AM -0600, Eric Schulte wrote:
> I think the difference between these two is that in LP the "product" is
> the executable piece of software, where as in RR the "product" is the
> document itself.
This is true, and I think the explanation suffers somewhat as a result
Hi Sam,
Not to be overly picky, but I think the scenario you described (while
very engaging) is an instance of Reproducible Research [1]. My
understanding of Reproducible Research and Literate Programming and
their relation is as follows...
- Literate Programming :: A style of programming in whi
Sam,
sam kleinman wrote:
...
Here's a literate programing example:
I talked with a statistician, programer and human rights violation
researcher, who wrote (with his team) reports of statistical studies
of data regarding possible genocide incidents. He wrote the LaTeX
documents which, within
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:41:50PM +0200, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
> I've heard that Knuth told about it in those words: it's when we will be able
> to read the code of a software in our bed, reading a book made of 90% of
> documentation and 10% of code. If someone can find this phrase somewhere...
