On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me take a step back and think aloud why we need a bug-tracking and
> testing system (if only to clarify my understanding) and who/when does
> it help. Following scenarios come to mind (and how they can be
> handled best (aga
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
[snip]
> I think the best thing people can do is keep a stable version and also
> test the CVS (oops) GIT version too very now and again.
+1
That's exactly what I try to do. I update almost every other day, go
through (using tig) the
Hi Richard,
Richard Riley wrote:
Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Richard,
Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Added this one to the Clippboard section on new org-tests/index.org in
Worg.git. (this section will be temporary...)
Something like the above should only be a
"Avdi Grimm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Richard Riley
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The nature of OSS means that the community using the product keep it
>> stable and bug free. I dont think the efforts to produce meaningful
>> regression tests would be benefi
Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Added this one to the Clippboard section on new org-tests/index.org in
>>> Worg.git. (this section will be temporary...)
>>
>> Something like the above should only be a link (at most) to th
On Oct 23, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Don't know how often the git repo is published.
Bernt and Ben, are you 'worgers' allready?
I think it's published hourly (maybe) and yes I have access to Worg.
The webserver pulls changes from the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason F. McBrayer) writes:
> Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Some kind of regression testing framework would be awesome. Org-mode is
>> large enough that this is almost a necessity to keep things stable and
>> bug-free.
>>
>
> Maybe something like this: http://www
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Richard Riley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The nature of OSS means that the community using the product keep it
> stable and bug free. I dont think the efforts to produce meaningful
> regression tests would be beneficial in an ever morphing product like
> org-mode.
Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Running a minimal emacs should suppress custom config files:
>> emacs -q -l yourtest.el
>
> Added this one to the Clippboard section on new org-tests/index.org in
> Worg.git. (this section will be tem
Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some kind of regression testing framework would be awesome. Org-mode is
> large enough that this is almost a necessity to keep things stable and
> bug-free.
>
Maybe something like this: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ElUnit ?
--
+-
Hi Richard,
Richard Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Added this one to the Clippboard section on new org-tests/index.org in
>> Worg.git. (this section will be temporary...)
>
> Something like the above should only be a link (at most) to the emacs
> manual. Reproducing standard info is bad in
On 2008-Oct-23, at 16:49, Richard Riley wrote:
Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Running a minimal emacs should suppress custom config files:
emacs -q -l yourtest.el
Added this one to the Clippboard section on new org-tests/index.or
12 matches
Mail list logo
