Sorry, let a typo slip in:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:34 AM, peter.fri...@agfa.com wrote:
[snip]
labeled: [[fn:label][text]]
anonymous: [[fn:]][text]]
reference: [[fn:label]]
Must of course be:
anonymous: [[fn:][text]]
Cheers,
Peter.
___
Emacs-orgm
On Dec 17, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
Paul R writes:
* Usage 1, anonymous footnotes
[snip]
And then we will have that one feature request to cross reference a
previous footnote! :-) In the above case, how would a person go
about asking someone to refer to an earlier foo
On Dec 17, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
Paul R writes:
[...]
Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following
usages :
* Usage 1, anonymous footnotes
Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands
from indigenous fighting methods
> I really like how elegant
> footnote markup is in LaTeX. AUCTeX solves readability problems by
> allowing the user to fold footnote macros and by indenting the text of
> footnotes when filling paragraphs. I wonder whether something similar
> could be implemented in in org-mode (perhaps akin to t
I was away from my computer for a few hours and was delighted to
discover this thread. This truly is an amazing mailing list.
"Scot Becker" writes:
> I'm torn.
>
> Usage 1 is harder to read. My footnotes, for example, are very long
> compared to your example. Of course, within emacs, this cou
