Hi Andrew,
On 2009-07-09, Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
> 3. Once I set a deadline for a task, it'd be nice if the priority would
> increase as the deadline approached. Ideally the criteria for
> increasing the priority could be specified via a customizable formula.
> Does this functionality (or any
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
3. Once I set a deadline for a task, it'd be nice if the priority
would
increase as the deadline approached. Ideally the criteria for
increasing the priority could be specified via a customizable
formula.
Does th
At Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:48:20 +0200,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> [...]
> Then again, as someone said, a DEADLINE with an appropriate warning
> delay would be fine in that case too.
I have tasks that have deadlines months in the future and which need
tackling from now until the deadline, although obvio
At Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:32:59 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
> Quite likely it's a failure of imagination on my part, but I still
> don't see why you would both schedule and deadline an item. Could
> you provide a scenario where that would be useful?
Well, to use an example that I think the OP (Andrew) w
Nick Dokos writes:
> Quite likely it's a failure of imagination on my part, but I still
> don't see why you would both schedule and deadline an item. Could
> you provide a scenario where that would be useful?
I think the OP has a time frame to execute some task. He doesn't want to
be bugged abou
Eric S Fraga wrote:
> At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:31 -0700,
> Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
> > In my mind, there is no conflict between scheduling and deadlining.
>
> I agree with you on this point but, in this case, it makes sense for
> both aspects to be highlighted in the agenda view. I would sugge
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:31 -0700,
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
> In my mind, there is no conflict between scheduling and deadlining.
I agree with you on this point but, in this case, it makes sense for
both aspects to be highlighted in the agenda view. I would suggest
that you might wish to change (
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
Nick Dokos wrote:
Just an FYI (a nice one since Carsten said so :-): Carsten is the first
name, Dominik (no c) is the surname of the creator of Org-mode. And I
promise we'll be nice even after he comes back :-)
Err, whoops!
So let me turn the question around: why do
Nick Dokos wrote:
Just an FYI (a nice one since Carsten said so :-): Carsten is the first
name, Dominik (no c) is the surname of the creator of Org-mode. And I
promise we'll be nice even after he comes back :-)
Err, whoops!
So let me turn the question around: why do you need to both SCHEDULE
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
> Also, Dominick said you had to be nice to me while he was away.
>
Just an FYI (a nice one since Carsten said so :-): Carsten is the first
name, Dominik (no c) is the surname of the creator of Org-mode. And I
promise we'll be nice even after he comes back :-)
> 1. Whe
Andrew M. Nuxoll said unto the world at 09/07/09 04:37 PM:
2. Once a TODO item has been marked as DONE, it still shows up on my
agenda. Can this be avoided?
I have the following lines in my .emacs:
(setq org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-done t)
(setq org-agenda-skip-deadline-if-done t)
Best,
On Apr 6, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Stathis Sideris wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to org mode (the bundling of ditaa made me aware of its
existence!), and having recently converted a relatively large volume
of notes from freemind, I'm now giving org mode a serious test drive.
Hi Stathis,
welcome!
I
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Stathis Sideris wrote:
[...]
>
> (2) Is there any way to make org-cycle skip the "show all" mode? That
> would make it to just collapse/expand the children of the current
> heading.
If I understood you right then TAB should do that for you (instead of
Sh
13 matches
Mail list logo