>>> However the plan is to make reveal-mode default:
>> You're jumping to conclusions,
> Sorry, but what is the plan then?
W.r.t. reveal-mode, there is no plan.
Stefan
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to th
> However the plan is to make reveal-mode default:
You're jumping to conclusions,
Stefan
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmo
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>> However the plan is to make reveal-mode default:
>
> You're jumping to conclusions,
Sorry, but what is the plan then?
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the
Dunno what is best, but when a solution is found, the following should
probably be tested to ensure that it is able to reverse the
non-editability:
(let ((buffer-invisibility-spec))
On 2010-09-03, Lennart Borgman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andreas Röhler
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
Hi Lennart,
IMHO cases are related but not identic.
When searching something and found inside hidden part, revealing that
part is a logical step.
Not so with parts hidden while no interest inside.
For example these hidden parts may be large.
Revealing them every time you type into by mistake
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andreas Röhler
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> posting forwarded herewith describes a design inconvenience, wich affects
> common hide-show- and outline-modes too.
>
> As too different solutions have been proposed, let me suggest
> "setting read-only property" rather than "use o
Hi,
posting forwarded herewith describes a design inconvenience, wich
affects common hide-show- and outline-modes too.
As too different solutions have been proposed, let me suggest
"setting read-only property" rather than "use of a modification hook".
Setting hidden text read-only should be
Hi Martin,
Martin Pohlack writes:
>> Can you give more details on how to set this up?
>
> These were just quick ideas, I have no working code here.
>
> Let me quickly draft something up:
Thanks for the details. I'll have a look at what solution best fits my
needs and report back.
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien
On 03.09.2010 02:02, Bastien wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Pohlack writes:
* You could add a modification hook to all hidden areas to unfold them
on modification, or
* You could set the read-only property for all hidden areas. This could
be setup at the same location where hidin
Hi Martin,
Martin Pohlack writes:
> * You could add a modification hook to all hidden areas to unfold them
> on modification, or
> * You could set the read-only property for all hidden areas. This could
> be setup at the same location where hiding is done.
I'm interested in testing both so
Hi David,
On 25.08.2010 11:22, David Abrahams wrote:
> I've gotten myself in trouble several times today by backspacing after
> an org-link that ends a headline. That's a typical pattern for
> editing an org-link, right? Well it turns out that if the item is
> folded, then the backspace writes o
11 matches
Mail list logo
