Skip Collins writes:
> I do not believe this is intended behavior for +strike-through+ text.
> The + symbol serves triple duty in org syntax as a an indicator for
> +stricken words+, a line drawing symbol in tables, and a #+keyword
> prefix.
It can also be an item which is a problem with LaTeX m
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Skip,
>
> Skip Collins writes:
>
> > I see little reason to continue to support +strike-through+ text.
> > Perhaps the simplest solution would be to deprecate stricken text and
> > disable it by default, allowing for an option to turn it on fo
Hi Skip,
Skip Collins writes:
> I see little reason to continue to support +strike-through+ text.
> Perhaps the simplest solution would be to deprecate stricken text and
> disable it by default, allowing for an option to turn it on for
> backward compatibility.
I agree. If no one object, I wil
