Re: [O] sqlite3 in org-babel

2012-02-18 Thread Eric Schulte
Daniel Clemente writes: >> Have you tried using a sqlite code block? See ob-sqlite.el > > I didn't notice there were both ob-sql and ob-sqlite. It would be > useful to mention sqlite inside ob-sql. Done. > > Perhaps they should be united? > I believe there were reasons for keeping th

Re: [O] sqlite3 in org-babel

2012-02-16 Thread Daniel Clemente
> Have you tried using a sqlite code block? See ob-sqlite.el I didn't notice there were both ob-sql and ob-sqlite. It would be useful to mention sqlite inside ob-sql. Perhaps they should be united? I still prefer ob-sql for sqlite because it lets me pass the parameter ":init /dev/null"

Re: [O] sqlite3 in org-babel

2012-02-15 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi Daniel, Have you tried using a sqlite code block? See ob-sqlite.el Best, Daniel Clemente writes: > Hi, >org-babel works well with sqlite3 if you add this (which I propose for > inclusion): > > - > diff --git a/lisp/ob-sql.el b/lisp/ob-sql.el > index 3f7882c..a5