Indeed, this seems to do the trick!
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ista Zahn wrote:
> Can't you just do
>
> #+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
>hello world
> #+end_src
>
> ?
>
> Best,
> Ista
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah wrote:
> > Is there some change in the stat
Can't you just do
#+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
hello world
#+end_src
?
Best,
Ista
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah wrote:
> Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
> language of the result?
>
> Cheers,
> Dror
>
> --
> Mahalo Tom,
>
>
Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
language of the result?
Cheers,
Dror
--
Mahalo Tom,
It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it
would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
specification.
Gre
Mahalo Tom,
It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it
would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
specification.
Greg
On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes:
>
>> I have a Ruby block that crea
Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes:
> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able
> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value
> code generates the enclosing SRC block,
> but using the same language (Ruby) used to ge
