On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 6:02 AM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> "Arthur A. Gleckler" writes:
>
> > Attached is a patch to allow one to specify that results from executing a
> > block should go to a specific buffer.
>
> It seems that nobody have noticed this email.
>
> The idea of sending source block ou
"Arthur A. Gleckler" writes:
> Attached is a patch to allow one to specify that results from executing a
> block should go to a specific buffer.
It seems that nobody have noticed this email.
The idea of sending source block output to a separate buffer (not
*Messages*) looks interesting for me.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:44 PM Arthur A. Gleckler
wrote:
> When a :buffer is specified, output goes to that buffer, which is erased
> first, e.g.:
>
> #+begin_src sh :results buffer
> echo foo
> #+end_src
>
Sorry, the first example was supposed to be:
#+begin_src sh :results buffer :b
