On 10/5/17, Samuel Wales wrote:
> delete-dups seems suspicious but what do i know. i wonder if
> cl-delete-duplicates is more efficient.
perhaps it has been made more efficient in new emacs versions than 24?
>
> (defun delete-dups (list)
> "Destructively remove `equal' duplicates from LIST.
>
On 10/5/17, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> i think delete-dups is suspicious here. is its only purpose to
>
> Why is delete-dups suspicious? Have you got a very large number of
> refile locations? If so, would it make sense to refine your target
> definitions?
already do that. my fallback "get most
Hello,
Samuel Wales writes:
> recent maint, but been a problem for a few mo.
>
> refile hits a wall. depends on number of headers.
>
> i think delete-dups is suspicious here. is its only purpose to
> eliminate the existing
> header?
Why is delete-dups suspicious? Have you got a very large num
