If you have a bibtex file open, run M-x org-ref-build-full-bibliography
which should make a pdf of the entries.
There isn't a super simple way to filter them right now. The way to do that
is use org-ref to add the citations you want in an org file, and then run
M-x org-ref-extract-bibtex-to-file,
On 2019-07-18 15:54, John Kitchin
writes:
M-x org-ref-open-bibtex-notes should do that when your cursor
is in a
bibtex entry.
Thank you very much, I don't know how I missed it.
Best,
Alan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
M-x org-ref-open-bibtex-notes should do that when your cursor is in a
bibtex entry.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.
On Saturday, 5 Jan 2019 at 16:59, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Thanks, right now I am struggling to install the pandoc-citeproc
> filter.
On Debian, it's its own package so easy but I do know that, at least in
the past, the version on Debian was quite significantly behind
upstream. This may or may not ma
>>> "Eric" == Eric S Fraga writes:
> I use the following (attached) script to convert LaTeX files (usually
> generated by org) to docx. It sometimes works well, or at least well
> enough for my uses. Maybe you can adapt it to your needs.
Thanks, right now I am struggling to install th
I use the following (attached) script to convert LaTeX files (usually
generated by org) to docx. It sometimes works well, or at least well
enough for my uses. Maybe you can adapt it to your needs.
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.1.14-1035-gfeb442
#!/bin/sh -f
BASE=$(basename $1
> I have used pandoc a little a while ago. See
>
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/01/29/Export-org-mode-to-docx-with-citations-via-pandoc/
> If you search pandoc on my blog you may find some more.
Thanks for pointing that out I did visit your blog. The resulting docx
does
>>> "Ken" == Ken Mankoff writes:
> On 2019-01-04 at 22:37 +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> I exported the org file in question to latex (I could also start
>> directly with latex for that matter.)
> Yes.
>> Could I stick with bibtex?
> Yes. No need to use biber + biblatex, you ca
On 2019-01-04 at 22:37 +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I exported the org file in question to latex (I could also start
> directly with latex for that matter.)
Yes.
> Could I stick with bibtex?
Yes. No need to use biber + biblatex, you can stick with bibtex.
I only run that command because my mas
I have used pandoc a little a while ago. See
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/01/29/Export-org-mode-to-docx-with-citations-via-pandoc/
If you search pandoc on my blog you may find some more.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >>> "Ken" == Ken Mankoff writes:
>
>
>>> "Ken" == Ken Mankoff writes:
> On 2019-01-04 at 18:08 +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> When I export it to html, the bibliography comes out nice. When I
>> export it to odt, the resulting odt files contains a lot of rubbish.
>>
>> A kludge is to export it to html and then open it
On 2019-01-04 at 18:08 +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> When I export it to html, the bibliography comes out nice. When I
> export it to odt, the resulting odt files contains a lot of rubbish.
>
> A kludge is to export it to html and then open it with LO/OO and copy
> it in an empty odt file, but is t
It is identical to the html output, it just that odt doesn't render the
html tags. You can just customize that variable to get rid of the html
markers, and then it will look better. I don't know how to get bold/italics
in odt though.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
>>> "John" == John Kitchin writes:
> Export to backends other than LaTeX have pretty limited support.
> I assume by a lot of rubbish you mean there is a lot of html markers in
> the bibliography.
Right.
> You can customize how these are formatted to some extent in the
> variable:
Export to backends other than LaTeX have pretty limited support.
I assume by a lot of rubbish you mean there is a lot of html markers in
the bibliography.
You can customize how these are formatted to some extent in the
variable: org-ref-bibliography-entry-format
This is not a citation preprocess
I didn’t see this before, too. Now, I tried to create a minimal example showing
the described behaviour, but I cannot reproduce it anymore. Now all is correct.
Sorry!
Johannes
Am 01.08.2018 um 13:06 schrieb John Kitchin
mailto:jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu>>:
I don't think I have ever seen this, an
I don't think I have ever seen this, and can't think of a reason why it
might be occurring.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchi
Maybe it isn't in customization. Try C-h v bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist
bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist is a variable defined in `bibtex.el'.
You have to set it with some elisp code.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Car
Thanks, John, for your hint.
I am able to find bibtex-biblatex-entry-alist but not the
bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist in the Bibtex customization group.
Johannes
Am 11.09.2017 um 02:38 schrieb John Kitchin
mailto:jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu>>:
I am pretty sure you cannot use entry types that are not def
I am pretty sure you cannot use entry types that are not defined
in bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist or bibtex-biblatex-entry-alist. You can add
types to those variables to get them to work.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Enginee
> * How to add ASME?
> I want to know if there is a way to add the ASME database to org-ref.
>
> I found this: https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/issues/148 which hints
> me in the right direction, but I don't know how to make it work.
>
> I am trying with this article:
> http://biomechanical.as
You can get that for articles like this:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(setf (cdr (assoc "article" (cdr (assoc "text"
org-ref-formatted-citation-formats "${title}")
#+END_SRC
Julian M. Burgos writes:
> Dear list,
>
> It is possible to customize the information shown in the minibuffer when
> the c
I can confirm this was happening. I am not sure how it broke, but I have
pushed a fix that I think fixes it.
Alan L Tyree writes:
> G'day,
>
> I have this near the end of my MS:
>
> bibliography:refs.bib,tyree.bib
>
> org-ref finds the entries from refs.bib, but not tyree.bib.
>
> If I reverse th
Dear John,
This is great. I will tweak this as needed.
Thanks a lot,
Christian
On 01/13/2017 01:04 AM, John Kitchin wrote:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(defun format--cjk-authors (orig-fun &rest args)
"Format authors my way."
(cl-loop for a in (s-split " and " value t)
collect
Christian Wittern writes:
> Dear John,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> On 01/11/2017 10:33 PM, John Kitchin wrote:
>>
>> There is not a way to hook or define a format for this that I know of.
>> For helm-bibtex, you might be able to redefine or advise
>> bibtex-completion-apa-format-authors to ha
Dear John,
Thanks for your answer.
On 01/11/2017 10:33 PM, John Kitchin wrote:
There is not a way to hook or define a format for this that I know of.
For helm-bibtex, you might be able to redefine or advise
bibtex-completion-apa-format-authors to handle that.
Well, thanks, I'll investigate t
Christian Wittern writes:
> Hi Org, especially Org-ref users,
>
> I have seen a number of org-ref related questions here recently, so I guess
> it is OK to ask here.
>
> I am trying to move to a more sophisticated bibliography format involving
> some new field types recently added to biblatex.
>
>>
>> 2. If you click on a citation link, you can select an action to copy the
>> formatted entry for that key.
>
>
> I had trouble with this. I constructed a minimal emacs config:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
> ;;; elpa interface
> (setq package-archives ())
> (add-to-list 'package-archives '("mar
Wow, this is pretty awesome, thank you.
A couple of notes inline
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:42 PM, John Kitchin
wrote:
>
> New org-ref update ;)
>
> I overhauled the formatted citation support in org-ref today.
>
> Now, you can do the following things:
>
> 1. from the C-c ] interface (helm-bibtex,
New org-ref update ;)
I overhauled the formatted citation support in org-ref today.
Now, you can do the following things:
1. from the C-c ] interface (helm-bibtex, helm-cite or ivy-cite) you can
mark some entries and choose an action that inserts formatted strings.
The default backend for this i
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, John Kitchin
wrote:
>
> Matt Price writes:
>
> > After several years, I'm finally trying to move to bibtex from zotero,
> > partly because org-zotxt has stopped working for me (both link insertion
> > and html export seem at least temporarily broken).
> >
> > The
That is possible. I am out now, but this afternoon I will send another note
on how to do it.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:05 AM Matt Price wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, John Kitchin
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Matt Price writes:
>
>
>
>
>
> > After several years, I'm finally trying to move to
Matt Price writes:
> After several years, I'm finally trying to move to bibtex from zotero,
> partly because org-zotxt has stopped working for me (both link insertion
> and html export seem at least temporarily broken).
>
> The UI for org-ref is pretty fantastic, and I love it. I'm having trouble
John Kitchin writes:
> I just pushed a feature that might get you back what you want.
>
> You can now put [[file:%F][%f]] in the org-ref-note-title-format
> variable, and it will put (concat org-ref-pdf-directory key ".pdf") in
> for %F, and (concat key ".pdf") in for %f. There is unfortunately,
I just pushed a feature that might get you back what you want.
You can now put [[file:%F][%f]] in the org-ref-note-title-format
variable, and it will put (concat org-ref-pdf-directory key ".pdf") in
for %F, and (concat key ".pdf") in for %f. There is unfortunately, no
check if the pdf actually exi
John Kitchin writes:
> This doesn't sound like something that should be happening I think. How
> current is your org-ref?
>
> I do not use the notes feature so it does not get tested too often. You
> may be able to control the format of the notes created with the variable
> org-ref-note-title-for
This doesn't sound like something that should be happening I think. How
current is your org-ref?
I do not use the notes feature so it does not get tested too often. You
may be able to control the format of the notes created with the variable
org-ref-note-title-format if you are using the default n
Martin Leduc writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered org-ref recently and would like to manage my entire
> pdf library with it. Basically, my set-up is a folder containing many
> scientific papers in pdf, and a bibtex file containing most of the
> entries related to these pdfs.
>
> My bibtex file
Martin Leduc writes:
> However, is there a way to bypass the download
> (because I already have the file) and to directly move/rename the pdf
> to the bibtex-pdfs/ folder while validating my bibtex entry (or
> creating a new one, does not matter) ?
I haven't yet used org-ref myself, but it shoul
It sounds like a css to me.
On Sunday, August 14, 2016, Johannes Brauer wrote:
> In the meantime I figured out that all works fine if the bibliography is a
> org-mode level 1 headline:
>
> * bibliography:referenzen.bib
> But if you write
>
> bibliography:referenzen.bib
>
> the bibliography is in
In the meantime I figured out that all works fine if the bibliography is a
org-mode level 1 headline:
* bibliography:referenzen.bib
But if you write
bibliography:referenzen.bib
the bibliography is in the html but not displayed
Johannes
Am 14.08.2016 um 18:43 schrieb John Kitchin
mailto:jkitc.
Is the bibliography actually in the html but not displayed in a browser?
It is hard to see how a theme would change the link export, although via
few it might change what is visible.
On Saturday, August 13, 2016, Johannes Brauer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using org-ref by John Kitchin bibliography html
You can customize the bibtex keys like this:
;; variables that control bibtex key format for auto-generation
;; I want firstauthor-year-title-words
;; this usually makes a legitimate filename to store pdfs under.
(setq bibtex-autokey-year-length 4
bibtex-autokey-name-year-separator "-"
What seems to be happening is those blocks are no longer special block, but
instead an export-block. If you change special-block to export block, then
it works for me with org-ref loaded.
I don't know why (or even how) org-ref would be changing that though.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Juli
I think thats what I mean.
org-ref-arxiv hasn't been changed for at least two months I think.
and the abstract is listed in the template here:
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/blob/2a8635d4662fbe77f43731edeac1b4ec1112d233/org-ref-arxiv.el#L103
Julien Cubizolles writes:
> John Kitchin write
John Kitchin writes:
> no problem. I am not sure when that happened though ;)
Do you mean you didn't add this functionnality recently and it's been
here all along ?
Julien.
no problem. I am not sure when that happened though ;)
Julien Cubizolles writes:
> John Kitchin writes:
>
>
>> If the data exists, then arxiv-add-bibtex-entry could probably add the
>> abstract if it existed. I am not too familiar with arxiv so I am not
>> sure.
>
> Just noticed that arxiv-get-p
John Kitchin writes:
> If the data exists, then arxiv-add-bibtex-entry could probably add the
> abstract if it existed. I am not too familiar with arxiv so I am not
> sure.
Just noticed that arxiv-get-pdf-add-bibtex-entry now includes the
abstract. Thanks a lot for implementing it.
Julien.
Julien Cubizolles writes:
> John Kitchin writes:
>
>> I am pretty sure the metadata from dx.doi.org doesn't contain any
>> abstract information, so there is not a way to put anything useful in
>> it. The abstract is often covered by copyright.
>
> I hadn't thought of that. But for some sources (a
John Kitchin writes:
> I am pretty sure the metadata from dx.doi.org doesn't contain any
> abstract information, so there is not a way to put anything useful in
> it. The abstract is often covered by copyright.
I hadn't thought of that. But for some sources (arXiv comes to mind)
that could be d
I am pretty sure the metadata from dx.doi.org doesn't contain any
abstract information, so there is not a way to put anything useful in
it. The abstract is often covered by copyright. You can add your own
abstract with bibtex-make-field (C-c C-f) in a bibtex entry, or you can
copy the bibtex entrie
Julien Cubizolles writes:
> org-ref makes it very easy to download a pdf paper when creating a new
> bibtex entry. However, there is no way that I could find to directly
> open the pdf from the bibtex entry. Could org-ref add some custom field
> like file={...} created when the pdf file is downlo
ref:fig2,fig3 will export to \ref{fig2,fig3} just fine. The only missing
functionality is the tooltip/clickability like on a cite link. Could you
add it as an enhancement issue here
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/issues/new?
It should not be too hard to do it, but it will take some time and t
\ref{fig2,fig3} not legal unless you use crever-ref package
On Feb 16, 2016, at 10:48 AM, John Kitchin
mailto:jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu>> wrote:
Is \ref{fig2,fig3} legal LaTeX?
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Ca
Thanks
On Feb 16, 2016, at 10:48 AM, John Kitchin
mailto:jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu>> wrote:
Is \ref{fig2,fig3} legal LaTeX?
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268
Is \ref{fig2,fig3} legal LaTeX?
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Doyl
Andreas Kiermeier writes:
> On 7 February 2016 at 04:38, John Kitchin wrote:
>
> that is why you don't get bibtex run then ;) try this
> (setq org-latex-pdf-process
> '("pdflatex -shell-escape -interaction nonstopmode
> -output-directory %o %b"
> "bibtex %b"
>
no reason. I do not actually use this code below. I have another
function that probably does want texify does ;) maybe some extra stuff
like running makeindex, etc
Andreas Kiermeier writes:
> On 7 February 2016 at 04:38, John Kitchin wrote:
>
>> that is why you don't get bibtex run then ;) t
On 7 February 2016 at 04:38, John Kitchin wrote:
> that is why you don't get bibtex run then ;) try this
> (setq org-latex-pdf-process
>'("pdflatex -shell-escape -interaction nonstopmode
> -output-directory %o %b"
> "bibtex %b"
> "pdflatex -shell-escape -interaction nons
YES, IT WORKS!
Thank you, Eric and John!
2016-02-06 19:08 GMT+01:00 John Kitchin :
> that is why you don't get bibtex run then ;) try this
> (setq org-latex-pdf-process
>'("pdflatex -shell-escape -interaction nonstopmode
> -output-directory %o %b"
> "bibtex %b"
> "pdfla
that is why you don't get bibtex run then ;) try this
(setq org-latex-pdf-process
'("pdflatex -shell-escape -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory
%o %b"
"bibtex %b"
"pdflatex -shell-escape -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory
%o %b"
"pdflatex -shell-esca
Eric S Fraga ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
> On Saturday, 6 Feb 2016 at 14:42, Nikolai Stenfors wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Org-ref appears to be an excellent reference handling tool for org-mode. I
> > have followed the installation according to org-ref homepage.
> > However, I have problems exporting the org-f
Then Eric is probably right:what is org-latex-to-pdf-process set to?
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
John Kitchin gmail.com> writes:
>
> It could also be you didn't specify a bibliographystyle.
>
> Try running M-x org-ref on the file. It checks that some things like that
are correct. Sometimes it is
> helpful to manually build the puff at the command line. Org hides a lot of
errors sometimes.
It could also be you didn't specify a bibliographystyle.
Try running M-x org-ref on the file. It checks that some things like that are
correct. Sometimes it is helpful to manually build the puff at the command
line. Org hides a lot of errors sometimes.
On February 6, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Eric S Fr
On Saturday, 6 Feb 2016 at 14:42, Nikolai Stenfors wrote:
> Hi,
> Org-ref appears to be an excellent reference handling tool for org-mode. I
> have followed the installation according to org-ref homepage.
> However, I have problems exporting the org-file to pdf. The generated
> intermediate latex-
If you have a pretty recent org-ref, You can set a list of functions for
org-ref-clean-bibtex-entry:
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/blob/master/org-ref.el#L302
Use this in an init file, and remove the functions you don't want to
run.
(setq org-ref-clean-bibtex-entry-hook
'(orcb-key-comma
I'm absolutely sure that I read it somewhere--its "Lay-Teck"--and again; if
you think about it, that's what it ought to be.
Hilarious "La" isn't from "Lamport"--very funny though.
I agree though, this is up to me to prove; but, don't hold your breath--it
may be hard to find--I have books to the c
"briangpowell ." writes:
> I believe I read how to correctly pronounce LaTeX as Lay-Teck (and why
> its important--to honor the creator of TeX's wishes+intentions, Donald
> Knuth) in Leslie Lamport's book onLaTeX--in the preface.
The TeX FAQ (http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-latexpronounce.html) contrad
On 2015-12-22, at 23:10, briangpowell . wrote:
> Small note, feel free to ignore it (one and all); but, "LaTeX" is properly
> pronounced: "Lay-Teck"--since its a macro language which "lays on top of
> TeX"--the TeX part you pronounced correctly, which is the part that really
> matters (Tau-Epsil
I believe I read how to correctly pronounce LaTeX as Lay-Teck (and why its
important--to honor the creator of TeX's wishes+intentions, Donald Knuth)
in Leslie Lamport's book on LaTeX--in the preface.
And when you think about it, pronouncing it as "Lay" does make sense "La"
only means "the" in some
John Kitchin writes:
> Thanks!
>
> You might add your interpretation of the pronunciation here:
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/17502/what-is-the-correct-pronunciation-of-tex-and-latex
> ;)
>
> John
>
The vexing issue of how to pronounce "LaTeX" has reared its ugly head
before, e.g i
Thanks!
You might add your interpretation of the pronunciation here:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/17502/what-is-the-correct-pronunciation-of-tex-and-latex
;)
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie M
Great vid, as usual; and, thanks for all you do for the Emacs+TeX+OrgMode
community.
Small note, feel free to ignore it (one and all); but, "LaTeX" is properly
pronounced: "Lay-Teck"--since its a macro language which "lays on top of
TeX"--the TeX part you pronounced correctly, which is the part th
Thanks!
B.V. Raghav writes:
> Hi,
>
> I had been following the thread(s) about org-ref by the words, out of
> curiosity. However, this video shows how examplary the work is. Awesome
> work sir.
>
> Thanks,
> r
--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carneg
Hi,
I had been following the thread(s) about org-ref by the words, out of
curiosity. However, this video shows how examplary the work is. Awesome
work sir.
Thanks,
r
--
(B.V. Raghav)
citeproc is so experimental right now I don't think it is ready to be
part of org-ref in melpa yet. It is in the git repo. If/when it becomes
useful to use, we can figure out how to include it.
Martin Yrjölä writes:
> Hi!
>
> John Kitchin writes:
>> I finally got org-ref up on melpa. If you hav
Hi!
John Kitchin writes:
> I finally got org-ref up on melpa. If you have been waiting to try it
> out for that, now is your chance!
Thank you John! This will certainly make it easier to install org-ref.
I'm wondering should org-ref-citeproc be included in org-ref or should
Melpa have an org-re
Thanks for pointing out!!!
This did the trick for me (using backquote `):
(setq reftex-default-bibliography `(,(concat my-dropbox-path
"bibliography/references.bib")))
Thanks again for your prompt help!
Cheers,
Kai
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Kitchin
wrote:
> That probably means s
That probably means some variable should be a list and it isn't, it is just
a string.
On Saturday, December 12, 2015, Kai Chen wrote:
> Well I was wrong, after I expand my-dropbox-path to full path, the problem
> is still there.
>
> Here are the results, the upper one is with the bibliography li
does that mean it is working now?
Kai Chen writes:
> Thanks for your suggestion! The problem lies in a variable I set which
> points to the directory of my Dropbox folder, to ensure emacs portable on
> different OS.
>
> When I have the bibliography link in the org file, the
> (org-ref-find-biblio
Well I was wrong, after I expand my-dropbox-path to full path, the problem
is still there.
Here are the results, the upper one is with the bibliography link while the
one at the bottom is without. Only the format changes, one with a quoted |
but another with a leading :
Could this be the cause?
=
Thanks for your suggestion! The problem lies in a variable I set which
points to the directory of my Dropbox folder, to ensure emacs portable on
different OS.
When I have the bibliography link in the org file, the
(org-ref-find-bibliography) will return the absolute path to the .bib file,
which in
That sounds odd.
What is the output of this src block in your file?
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(org-ref-find-bibliography)
#+END_SRC
Kai Chen writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I just got to know org-ref, and I followed the github help page to manually
> install the package and set the default path similar
On 2015-06-16 Tue 18:28, Titus von der Malsburg wrote:
> On 2015-06-16 Tue 17:39, Julian Burgos wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I have been using org-ref for a while, using reftex to insert citations in
>> my org documents. Now I am switching to helm-bibtex, which is pretty
>> awesome. I have a coup
Hi Titus,
I think a very simple template for the notes file would suffice. I am
using org ref and had originally modified the template by removing the
TODO, simplifying the properties drawer (no need to duplicate all the
biblatex info here) and adding a link to the pdf file, which is very handy
w
Thanks John. You are right, although I think having to read too many org
files would make the agenda run slower. And creates a lot of buffers (one
per file) which makes navigation more complicated. I always wished that
the agenda would close those buffers. Anyway, I think that having a
single f
On 2015-06-16 Tue 17:39, Julian Burgos wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have been using org-ref for a while, using reftex to insert citations in
> my org documents. Now I am switching to helm-bibtex, which is pretty
> awesome. I have a couple of question about the note files. Org-ref uses
> a single f
Julian Burgos writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I have been using org-ref for a while, using reftex to insert citations in
> my org documents. Now I am switching to helm-bibtex, which is pretty
> awesome. I have a couple of question about the note files. Org-ref uses
> a single file to keep notes (e.g.
Yeah, helm bibtex is awesome. This has been a major topic of discussion in the
module development. See: https://github.com/tmalsburg/helm-bibtex/issues/40
Last I talked with the developer, he was thinking hard about it and had maybe
even started development on single-note file options.
"Julian
The thing to do here is write a function that will take a bibtex key, and
loop through your directories to find the pdf, and then return the full
path to the pdf. Then customize the variable org-ref-get-pdf-filename-function
to point to that function.
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/blob/maste
The markdown file will not contain the bibliography. You have to use
pandoc to get that, e.g. create a bibtex file containing the citations,
and run something like
pandoc --bibliography=test.bib --filter pandoc-citeproc test.md -o
test.odt
This works on a minimal kind of example for me.
see also
Yes, you were right. An update of org-mode fixed everything. Thanks again!
John Kitchin writes:
> If you look in your messages do you see something like jit-lock errors?
> I do not recall exactly what the errors are but the ones I have seen
> that resemble what you describe have jit in them.
>
If you look in your messages do you see something like jit-lock errors?
I do not recall exactly what the errors are but the ones I have seen
that resemble what you describe have jit in them.
I saw this recently in an ELPA version (maybe around Sept 1), and it went away
when I updated
the ELPA o
John, another issue...a really minor one, and I am not sure if it is
org-ref related. When I open the notes file, the org faces are not
applied evenly. In particular,
a) Text after #TITLE: or #AUTHOR appears as regular text. If I use M-x
describe face, I get "default". If modify in any way th
Excellent! Many thanks... now it works like a charm.
John Kitchin writes:
> No problem. Thanks for the tips to replicate this. It was pretty helpful
> in solving the problem (and thanks again to Nick who pointed me towards
> edebug-defun a while ago!)
>
> I think I have fixed this. The problem wa
No problem. Thanks for the tips to replicate this. It was pretty helpful
in solving the problem (and thanks again to Nick who pointed me towards
edebug-defun a while ago!)
I think I have fixed this. The problem was org-ref was not finding a key
that exists in a file. the way that is done all over
Hi John,
I am resending this... I think it did not went through the previous
time.
I think I can replicate the org-ref bug now (if it is a bug). This is
the situation:
a) If I open emacs, load a file that already has some link, and click on
the link (or place the cursor on it and press enter) I
Hi John,
I think I can replicate the org-ref bug now (if it is a bug). This is the
situation:
a) If I open emacs, load a file that already has some link, and click on
the link (or place the cursor on it and press enter) I get the "no key
found" message and I cannot open the notes file (I get a
John, for some weird reason everything seems to be working now. Thanks
for your help... I will let you know if I break it again.
John Kitchin writes:
> that is odd. this means org-ref is not finding the key you clicked
> on. could you send me a small example that reproduces your problem (an
> or
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
