Bastien writes:
>> Do you mind if I revert that commit and implement the change?
>
> Absolutely not, on the contrary.
Done.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ:
http://Synth.Stromeko
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those
>> versions? Why? If so, we can simply get rid of the compatibility
>> macro and use (random).
>
> Do you mind if I revert that commit and implement the change?
Absolutely not, on the co
Bastien writes:
> Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those
> versions? Why? If so, we can simply get rid of the compatibility
> macro and use (random).
Do you mind if I revert that commit and implement the change?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron
Bastien wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
> > Sorry, but that macro doesn't call `random´ appropriately at all.
>
> The real problem is (random t) in previous versions of org-id.el.
>
> Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those
> versions? Why? If so, we can simply g
Bastien writes:
> The real problem is (random t) in previous versions of org-id.el.
Yes.
> Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those
> versions? Why? If so, we can simply get rid of the compatibility
> macro and use (random).
That would be the correct thing to do.
>>
Achim Gratz writes:
> Sorry, but that macro doesn't call `random´ appropriately at all.
The real problem is (random t) in previous versions of org-id.el.
Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those
versions? Why? If so, we can simply get rid of the compatibility
macro
