Am Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:59:32 +0200
schrieb Bastien :
> There was a hidden clue the commit could be problematic...
>
> Gregor Zattler writes:
>
> > First bad commit is:
> > bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
> ^^^
That must be a first look at the singularity.
"The git" knows it all.
I
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Richard [30. Apr. 2015]:
> Gregor Zattler writes:
> > Sorry, no:
>
> From Bastien's comment, I wonder : does the following patch helps ?
Yes, but see my other email: The fix in
ea575950d957fcecc74ed6f53c29bb6b77e9fe26 works.
Thanks, grgeor
Gregor Zattler writes:
> Sorry, no:
>From Bastien's comment, I wonder : does the following patch helps ?
--- /dev/fd/63 2015-04-30 13:44:20.900676564 +0200
+++ /tmp/org-src.el 2015-04-30 13:43:50.924673810 +0200
@@ -539,35 +539,36 @@
- When formatting a source code snippet for export with
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Richard [30. Apr. 2015]:
> Gregor Zattler writes:
> > First bad commit is:
> > bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
>
> Nice hash for a "bad" commit :)
I didn't realise :-)
> > This results in a startup error:
> > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable write-
Gregor Zattler writes:
> First bad commit is:
> bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
Nice hash for a "bad" commit :)
> This results in a startup error:
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable write-back)
Is it related to your initial problem ?
I think this specific bug was fixed
There was a hidden clue the commit could be problematic...
Gregor Zattler writes:
> First bad commit is:
> bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
^^^
!